Debates between Lord Fowler and Lord Bishop of Oxford during the 2019-2024 Parliament

Thu 23rd Apr 2020

Vagrancy Act 1824

Debate between Lord Fowler and Lord Bishop of Oxford
Thursday 23rd April 2020

(4 years, 7 months ago)

Lords Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text Read Debate Ministerial Extracts
Lord Fowler Portrait The Lord Speaker
- Hansard - -

Lord Falconer of Thoroton. No? Lord Harries of Pentregarth.

Lord Bishop of Oxford Portrait Lord Harries of Pentregarth (CB)
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

Following on from the question from the noble Lord, Lord Foulkes, if Scotland can abolish this without any harmful effects, surely we can do the same in this country. Bearing in mind what the Minister said about using the law to encourage rough sleepers to find help, there are plenty of other laws on the statute book about disorderly behaviour and being a public nuisance that could be used in exactly the same way. Given the Government’s wonderful promises about housing rough sleepers in hotels, how many rough sleepers does the Minister think have not yet been housed?

Lord Keen of Elie Portrait Lord Keen of Elie
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

There are other statutory provisions in place addressing public order offences; the Public Order Act 1986 is an example and I also mentioned the Anti-Social Behaviour, Crime and Policing Act 2014. However, the evidential requirements of these other statutory provisions can be quite challenging when dealing with those who are sleeping rough. For example, it is not possible to serve a community protection notice under the 2014 Act without a prior written warning. Noble Lords will appreciate that it may be difficult to issue a prior warning to someone with no fixed abode in the first instance and then to follow that up with further steps. There is a place for the provisions of the 1824 Act, but of course we will look very carefully at all sources of opinion in respect of this matter. I reiterate that Section 3 of the 1824 Act has never extended to Scotland—only Section 4.