Debates between Lord Forsyth of Drumlean and Lord Lansley during the 2015-2017 Parliament

Housing and Planning Bill

Debate between Lord Forsyth of Drumlean and Lord Lansley
Tuesday 10th May 2016

(8 years, 1 month ago)

Lords Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text
Lord Lansley Portrait Lord Lansley (Con)
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

I am grateful to my noble friend. I think the argument is stronger than he put in relation to financial privilege being claimed, because that has happened twice. The second time, which was last Wednesday, the noble Lord, Lord Kerslake, believed that the amendment would not invoke financial privilege, but it did. In that sense, the House has perhaps inadvertently sent an amendment back in lieu once, in contradiction of the financial privilege argument. To do so twice seems a serious breach of the convention.

Lord Forsyth of Drumlean Portrait Lord Forsyth of Drumlean
- Hansard - -

My noble friend is absolutely right. As he knows, I always pull my punches, but he is right to invite me to make the case even more strongly. Of course, when I intervened earlier and asked the noble Lord, Lord Kerslake, if he would deal with the issue of financial privilege, he said that in his opinion his amendment did not breach that; but that is what he said the last time, and the House of Commons took a different view. He has made his argument, and my noble friend the Minister has shown enormous patience throughout the passage of this Bill, along with the rest of us who have been here to support her in the Division Lobbies. I hope that the noble Lord will accept, as my noble friend Lord Cormack said, that he has taken this matter as far as he can and that it is a matter for the elected Government and for the House of Commons to take things forward.