Lord Mandelson: Response to Humble Address Motion Debate

Full Debate: Read Full Debate
Department: Cabinet Office

Lord Mandelson: Response to Humble Address Motion

Lord Faulks Excerpts
Tuesday 17th March 2026

(1 day, 10 hours ago)

Lords Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text Watch Debate Read Debate Ministerial Extracts
Baroness Anderson of Stoke-on-Trent Portrait Baroness Anderson of Stoke-on-Trent (Lab)
- View Speech - Hansard - - - Excerpts

The noble Lord will be able to read any and all correspondence for himself as further tranches are published.

Lord Faulks Portrait Lord Faulks (Non-Afl)
- View Speech - Hansard - -

Further to the question from the noble Lord, Lord West, I understand that the amount that Lord Mandelson is to receive is much less than he asked for. The Minister said that that was to save costs. In many cases, there is surely a commercial reason for settling, but, given that this case is of such constitutional importance, would it not be far better to see whether a court agrees that Lord Mandelson is entitled to any compensation at all?

Baroness Anderson of Stoke-on-Trent Portrait Baroness Anderson of Stoke-on-Trent (Lab)
- View Speech - Hansard - - - Excerpts

The noble Lord raises an important and valid point. In this instance, it was considered a sensible move to remove Lord Mandelson from the payroll as quickly as possible.