Debates between Lord Faulkner of Worcester and Lord Fowler during the 2019-2024 Parliament

Divorce

Debate between Lord Faulkner of Worcester and Lord Fowler
Wednesday 6th January 2021

(3 years, 10 months ago)

Lords Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text Read Debate Ministerial Extracts
Lord Fowler Portrait The Lord Speaker (Lord Fowler)
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

Moving on to the next supplementary, I call the noble Lord, Lord Faulkner.

Lord Faulkner of Worcester Portrait Lord Faulkner of Worcester (Lab)
- Hansard - -

My Lords, I think we are all aware that this post-Christmas period is a particularly difficult time for relationships, and the feelings of depression and anxiety among divorcees, which the noble Baroness, Lady Deech, referred to, are made worse when they are worried about whether they can afford professional or legal advice. So many decide to represent themselves in the divorce court rather than to have professional advice, sometimes with disastrous results. How do the Government intend to ensure that poorer people have access to justice, and what are they doing to relieve the huge burden of overwork for court staff which leads to phones not being answered and cases postponed?

Covid-19: Great Barrington Declaration

Debate between Lord Faulkner of Worcester and Lord Fowler
Tuesday 13th October 2020

(4 years, 1 month ago)

Lords Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text Read Debate Ministerial Extracts
Lord Fowler Portrait The Lord Speaker (Lord Fowler)
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

I call the noble Lord, Lord Faulkner, who I forgot to call before.

Lord Faulkner of Worcester Portrait Lord Faulkner of Worcester (Lab) [V]
- Hansard - -

My Lords, is the Minister aware that this so-called declaration is principally the work of the American Institute for Economic Research, a libertarian think tank funded by the Koch foundation and best known for its denial of climate change? As the Minister said in an earlier answer, a large number of the signatories are completely bogus. Does he agree that we should have nothing to do with fake science, which provides cover for a cull of the elderly and the disabled under the guise of herd immunity and promotes an American far-right agenda?