UN Security Council: Kazakhstan Debate

Full Debate: Read Full Debate

Lord Faulkner of Worcester

Main Page: Lord Faulkner of Worcester (Labour - Life peer)

UN Security Council: Kazakhstan

Lord Faulkner of Worcester Excerpts
Tuesday 12th April 2016

(8 years, 8 months ago)

Lords Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text
Earl of Courtown Portrait The Earl of Courtown
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

My Lords, I have no doubt of Kazakhstan’s commitment to water, food and energy security and its role in nuclear disarmament. I recognise that these are important issues. However, as I am sure the noble Lord appreciates, we have a long-standing policy of never revealing our voting intentions for Security Council elections.

Lord Faulkner of Worcester Portrait Lord Faulkner of Worcester (Lab)
- Hansard - -

My Lords, has there been any change in Kazakhstan’s human rights record since the United States Department of State reported on it in 2013, when it described the most significant human rights problems as severe limits on citizens’ rights to change their Government; restrictions on freedom of speech, press, assembly, religion and association; and the lack of an independent judiciary? It also talked about other reported abuses, including arbitrary and unlawful killings, military hazing that led to deaths, and detainee and prisoner torture. Is this the sort of country we wish to encourage to join the Security Council?

Earl of Courtown Portrait The Earl of Courtown
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

My Lords, the noble Lord makes some very important points from the 2013 report. There are still problems with freedom of expression. Kazakhstan’s legislation on NGOs is of concern and progress on human rights has not been quite as fast or comprehensive as we and others would wish in the 25 years since independence. Significant reforms are under way, however, and important progress has been made on social and women’s rights and prevention of torture.