To match an exact phrase, use quotation marks around the search term. eg. "Parliamentary Estate". Use "OR" or "AND" as link words to form more complex queries.


Keep yourself up-to-date with the latest developments by exploring our subscription options to receive notifications direct to your inbox

Division Vote (Lords)
11 Mar 2026 - Crime and Policing Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Elliott of Mickle Fell (Con) voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 178 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes
Vote Tally: Ayes - 227 Noes - 221
Division Vote (Lords)
11 Mar 2026 - Crime and Policing Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Elliott of Mickle Fell (Con) voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 181 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes
Vote Tally: Ayes - 215 Noes - 180
Division Vote (Lords)
9 Mar 2026 - Crime and Policing Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Elliott of Mickle Fell (Con) voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 162 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes
Vote Tally: Ayes - 200 Noes - 162
Speech in Lords Chamber - Thu 26 Feb 2026
Resetting the UK-EU Relationship (European Affairs Committee Report)

"My Lords, as speaker number 31, I am relieved to have picked an aspect of the report that has yet to be discussed in much detail. I will use my time to concur with recommendation 24 of the report, which asks the Government to set out how joining Erasmus+ brings …..."
Lord Elliott of Mickle Fell - View Speech

View all Lord Elliott of Mickle Fell (Con - Life peer) contributions to the debate on: Resetting the UK-EU Relationship (European Affairs Committee Report)

Written Question
Financial Conduct Authority
Thursday 26th February 2026

Asked by: Lord Elliott of Mickle Fell (Conservative - Life peer)

Question to the HM Treasury:

To ask His Majesty's Government what assessment they have made of the progress of the Financial Conduct Authority in its secondary international competitiveness and growth objective.

Answered by Lord Livermore - Financial Secretary (HM Treasury)

Since the introduction of the Financial Conduct Authority’s (FCA’s) secondary international competitiveness and growth objective in 2023, the FCA has made meaningful progress in working to further the objective. For example, last year, the FCA consulted on proposals that will reduce reporting requirements for more than 36,000 firms, with expected annual savings of over £28 million. The FCA also recently launched the Scale-Up Unit jointly with the Prudential Regulation Authority, which will make it simpler for scaling firms to get timely responses to regulatory queries and access expert support. This will support entrepreneurs to focus on developing new products, hiring staff, and bringing investment into local economies.

The Government welcomes the two reports the FCA published in 2024 and 2025, and the accompanying metrics, outlining the FCA’s performance against the objective, as well as the letters from the FCA Chief Executive to the Prime Minister in January 2025 and December 2025 to outline progress on almost 50 measures to support growth through financial services regulation.

The Treasury continues to work closely with the FCA to hold it to account and challenge it to go further to support the government’s growth mission while furthering its objectives. This includes through the regular performance reviews the Economic Secretary holds with the FCA Chief Executive, introduced in 2025 as part of the government’s wider Regulation Action Plan.


Written Question
Investment
Thursday 26th February 2026

Asked by: Lord Elliott of Mickle Fell (Conservative - Life peer)

Question to the HM Treasury:

To ask His Majesty's Government what estimate they have made of the number of long-term asset funds (LTAFs) that were available to consumers before the announcement that LTAFs can be held in stocks and shares individual savings accounts from 2026.

Answered by Lord Livermore - Financial Secretary (HM Treasury)

The Government wants to make sure that those who have the ability to put away money for the long-term can do so, and enabling Long-Term Asset Funds (LTAFs) to be held in Stocks & Shares ISAs aims to enable more people to have access to longer-term investment options.

The Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) publishes details of authorised funds on its website.


Written Question
PISCES
Thursday 26th February 2026

Asked by: Lord Elliott of Mickle Fell (Conservative - Life peer)

Question to the HM Treasury:

To ask His Majesty's Government whether they plan to limit the period of the Private Intermittent Securities and Capital Exchange System Sandbox to less than five years.

Answered by Lord Livermore - Financial Secretary (HM Treasury)

The Private Intermittent Securities and Capital Exchange System (PISCES) Sandbox is due to last five years, until 5 June 2030, with the possibility of extension.

The Treasury is working with the Financial Conduct Authority to monitor outcomes during the lifetime of the sandbox and retains the ability to terminate or make the sandbox arrangements permanent at an earlier stage if appropriate, subject to Parliamentary approval.

In any case, the Treasury is committed to providing transparency, certainty and clear communications to PISCES operators and market participants.


Division Vote (Lords)
25 Feb 2026 - Crime and Policing Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Elliott of Mickle Fell (Con) voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 126 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes
Vote Tally: Ayes - 172 Noes - 148
Division Vote (Lords)
25 Feb 2026 - Crime and Policing Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Elliott of Mickle Fell (Con) voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 170 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes
Vote Tally: Ayes - 213 Noes - 150
Division Vote (Lords)
24 Feb 2026 - Tobacco and Vapes Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Elliott of Mickle Fell (Con) voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 72 Conservative Aye votes vs 13 Conservative No votes
Vote Tally: Ayes - 78 Noes - 246