All 1 Debates between Lord Elis-Thomas and Lord Murphy of Torfaen

Wed 23rd Nov 2016
Wales Bill
Lords Chamber

Committee: 4th sitting (Hansard): House of Lords

Wales Bill

Debate between Lord Elis-Thomas and Lord Murphy of Torfaen
Committee: 4th sitting (Hansard): House of Lords
Wednesday 23rd November 2016

(8 years ago)

Lords Chamber
Read Full debate Wales Act 2017 View all Wales Act 2017 Debates Read Hansard Text Read Debate Ministerial Extracts Amendment Paper: HL Bill 63-IV Fourth marshalled list for Committee (PDF, 142KB) - (21 Nov 2016)
Lord Howarth of Newport Portrait Lord Howarth of Newport
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

The noble Lord, Lord Elis-Thomas, is not only a master of procedure both in the Welsh Assembly and in this Parliament; he is also most ingenious politically.

Lord Murphy of Torfaen Portrait Lord Murphy of Torfaen (Lab)
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

My Lords, I support my noble friend Lord Rowlands on his tidy amendment, which comes from a tidy friend. I have had the great pleasure of knowing my noble friend for 46 years; in fact, I was still in the sixth form when he first became a Welsh Member of Parliament. I know that the Minister has been hugely constructive during proceedings on the Bill. I hope that he will listen carefully to the points made by my noble friend, the noble and learned Lord, Lord Judge, and others with regard to Amendment 111.

I also support my noble friend Lord Elis-Thomas on his amendments, particularly on what he said about the role of the Secretary of State for Wales having changed dramatically. When he was a new Presiding Officer and I was a new Secretary of State, I had a desk and a seat in the National Assembly. I also had an office there. When I had finished some years later in 2009, I had lost both my seat and my office. That was a measure of the Assembly growing up and beginning to understand that we do not want Secretaries of State interfering any more in what it does.

Lord Elis-Thomas Portrait Lord Elis-Thomas
- Hansard - -

I am sure that my noble friend will want to explain to the Committee that this happened with the full consent of the holder of the office of Secretary of State, and that our relationship was always one of positive development.