All 1 Debates between Lord Douglas-Miller and Earl Cathcart

Farmers: Flooding Compensation

Debate between Lord Douglas-Miller and Earl Cathcart
Tuesday 16th April 2024

(7 months, 1 week ago)

Lords Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text Read Debate Ministerial Extracts
Lord Douglas-Miller Portrait Lord Douglas-Miller (Con)
- View Speech - Hansard - -

The noble Baroness will be very well aware that there is a trade here between the environmental gains we are looking to enact and protecting our food production. One of the main aims of ELMS is to improve productivity, and a lot of the funding through ELMS is driving better productivity—higher yields from smaller areas of land—so that we can then allow land to be available for nature and improve our biodiversity.

Earl Cathcart Portrait Earl Cathcart (Con)
- View Speech - Hansard - - - Excerpts

My Lords, I am a farmer and luckily my crops are all planted, but many farmers are not so lucky, with fields that have been underwater since October. Even fields that have not flooded are too wet now to plant. Many farmers find it very difficult to get any information on the flood recovery scheme and to know whether they are eligible. What are the Government going to do to help them?

Lord Douglas-Miller Portrait Lord Douglas-Miller (Con)
- View Speech - Hansard - -

The Rural Payments Agency is contacting all eligible farmers to remove the burden of the farmers themselves having to contact the RPA. The RPA has a range of measures to look at these issues—aerial photography, digital mapping and local knowledge—to assess who is eligible, and it will contact farmers directly. Any farmer who feels that they should be eligible and has not been contacted by the RPA may, of course, contact it directly.