Police Reform and Social Responsibility Bill Debate
Full Debate: Read Full DebateLord De Mauley
Main Page: Lord De Mauley (Conservative - Excepted Hereditary)Department Debates - View all Lord De Mauley's debates with the Leader of the House
(13 years, 7 months ago)
Lords ChamberMy Lords, there are a number of problems with Amendment 31. The first is that we have not debated it yet. We have not agreed it. Logically, if we are to have a structured debate, it should start with Amendment 31. The problem is that we would be debating Amendment 1 all over again.
Following the advice of the noble Lord opposite, I beg to move that the Committee do now adjourn during pleasure until 9.10 pm.
I am going to have to crave your Lordships’ indulgence and ask if we can have a further adjournment during pleasure until 9.20 pm.