All 2 Debates between Lord Bishop of Ripon and Leeds and Lord De Mauley

Horsemeat and Food Fraud

Debate between Lord Bishop of Ripon and Leeds and Lord De Mauley
Monday 11th February 2013

(11 years, 10 months ago)

Lords Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text Read Debate Ministerial Extracts
Lord De Mauley Portrait Lord De Mauley
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

My Lords, it is right that industry should be responsible for the safety and authenticity of the food it produces and sells, which is why the Government work with it to maintain confidence in the food chain. All systems of standards and quality control depend to a certain extent on self-regulation and due diligence. While the Government have a role in checking and monitoring industry, particularly where there are public health issues, non-regulatory approaches and agreements can be just as effective and can be achieved faster than legislation. This can be seen in our approach over recent days, where government and industry have come together with a joint aim of maintaining consumer confidence in the food chain.

Lord Bishop of Ripon and Leeds Portrait The Lord Bishop of Ripon and Leeds
- Hansard - -

My Lords, I return to the question of the contamination of halal meat, which got a brief reference in the Statement and has real implications for faith communities and faith relationships. This may not have been a matter of deliberate fraud but it must have been dangerously careless. Can the Minister give us more reassurance on the action taken by the food industry as regards finding non-halal traces in allegedly halal food, including in food supplied by government contracts such as prison suppliers?

Lord De Mauley Portrait Lord De Mauley
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

My Lords, I agree wholeheartedly with the right reverend Prelate that it is essential that people can have confidence that what they are eating is what it is made out to be. There is responsibility throughout the food chain. Suppliers are responsible for what they supply onwards to other organisations and businesses. We are reminding public bodies of their responsibility for their own food contracts. We expect them to have rigorous procurement procedures in place with reputable suppliers. We expect caterers and suppliers to public institutions to have appropriate controls, including testing and sampling regimes, in place to ensure the authenticity of their products. If caterers have any doubts about the provenance of their product, they should seek assurance from their suppliers.

Banks: Mutual Ownership

Debate between Lord Bishop of Ripon and Leeds and Lord De Mauley
Wednesday 2nd March 2011

(13 years, 9 months ago)

Lords Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text
Lord De Mauley Portrait Lord De Mauley
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

My Lords, I am not fully aware of that and I will come back to the noble Lord on the matter.

Lord Bishop of Ripon and Leeds Portrait The Lord Bishop of Ripon and Leeds
- Hansard - -

My Lords, does the Minister agree that one of the major issues in this area is the lack of trust in the large banks? Does he accept that trust is much higher in organisations that retain a mutual element, such as the Nationwide Building Society or the John Lewis Partnership? Will he affirm that there is a need, whatever arrangements are being made, for real attention to be paid to the need for a restoration of trust within the sector, of which mutualisation might well be a very important part?

Lord De Mauley Portrait Lord De Mauley
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

My Lords, I absolutely take the right reverend Prelate’s point. It is very well made.