Sudan: Human Rights Debate
Full Debate: Read Full DebateLord Bishop of Gloucester
Main Page: Lord Bishop of Gloucester (Bishops - Bishops)Department Debates - View all Lord Bishop of Gloucester's debates with the Foreign, Commonwealth & Development Office
(14 years, 5 months ago)
Lords ChamberOn the noble Lord’s second question, I am afraid that there do appear to have been abuses in those and many other areas, and these matters will need to be monitored and safeguarded very carefully—more so than in the past. On the question of additional troops, by which I assume he means reinforcements for UNMIS, that is a difficult matter at the moment. We want some means by which the weak Government of Southern Sudan can somehow be strengthened in order to prepare for the enormous strains that lie ahead either way, whether the referendum goes for separation or not. Either way seems to point to more violence, danger and abuses.
My Lords, given that the Governments of both north and south Sudan have little control of the country outside the few conurbations, and that the only organisations with an effective network across the whole of Sudan are the Roman Catholic and Episcopal churches, what plans might Her Majesty’s Government have to encourage both Sudanese Governments to link with the churches in order to build stability and peace prior to the referendum?
I am grateful to the right reverend Prelate. In all our urgings and advice, we take account of those important factors and will continue to do so.