Debates between Lord Benyon and Graeme Morrice during the 2010-2015 Parliament

Oral Answers to Questions

Debate between Lord Benyon and Graeme Morrice
Thursday 25th October 2012

(12 years, 2 months ago)

Commons Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text Read Debate Ministerial Extracts
Lord Benyon Portrait Richard Benyon
- Hansard - -

I hope that in the reply I gave to my hon. and learned Friend the Member for Sleaford and North Hykeham (Stephen Phillips) I showed the seriousness with which we are looking at this issue. We know that pollinators benefit our economy by around £450 million a year. That is a service that nature provides. We want to make absolutely sure that we are protecting that, and we will work with any organisation that is doing research of that kind.

Graeme Morrice Portrait Graeme Morrice (Livingston) (Lab)
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

9. What recent assessment he has made of the potential risks of a badger cull.

Oral Answers to Questions

Debate between Lord Benyon and Graeme Morrice
Thursday 24th November 2011

(13 years, 1 month ago)

Commons Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text Read Debate Ministerial Extracts
Graeme Morrice Portrait Graeme Morrice (Livingston) (Lab)
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

T8. Business groups have warned that the Government’s decision to delay the establishment of marine conservation zones will impede investment in marine industries, including renewable energy and sustainable fishery projects. Does the Secretary of State agree?

Lord Benyon Portrait Richard Benyon
- Hansard - -

We are progressing the implementation of an ecologically coherent network of marine conservation zones, which have to be sustainable in every sense. That means that they have to be able to withstand any challenge that may be put to them, legal or otherwise, so we need to get more evidence for some of them. I can assure the hon. Gentleman that this Government remain absolutely determined to take this forward, but we need to get it right. If that means we have to take a month or two longer—or six months longer, to be perfectly accurate—that would be a better way than getting it wrong.