All 4 Debates between Lord Barker of Battle and Nicholas Dakin

Oral Answers to Questions

Debate between Lord Barker of Battle and Nicholas Dakin
Thursday 27th February 2014

(10 years, 8 months ago)

Commons Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text
Lord Barker of Battle Portrait Gregory Barker
- Hansard - -

I am grateful to my hon. Friend for raising this important issue. The coalition is absolutely committed to improving access to financial services for the vulnerable, particularly the fuel-poor. As recommended by the Parliamentary Commission on Banking Standards, the Government are seeking a voluntary industry agreement on renewed minimum standards for basic bank accounts. In addition, we have committed nearly £2 million over this year to develop the big energy saving network to ensure that the most vulnerable are getting the best deals they can.

Nicholas Dakin Portrait Nic Dakin (Scunthorpe) (Lab)
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

Is not the sluggishness of Ofgem in tackling this discrimination yet further evidence that it is no longer fit for purpose?

Lord Barker of Battle Portrait Gregory Barker
- Hansard - -

No, it is not. This is an ongoing situation. Ofgem has looked at the issue, but it is not something that one can look at once and then discard. That may be Labour’s approach, but we are maintaining long-term vigilance to make sure that the consumer is looked after on an ongoing basis, month in, month out. It is very important that they will now have the additional benefit of a referral to the competition test.

Oral Answers to Questions

Debate between Lord Barker of Battle and Nicholas Dakin
Thursday 17th October 2013

(11 years, 1 month ago)

Commons Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text
Lord Barker of Battle Portrait Gregory Barker
- Hansard - -

The thing about this Government’s energy policy is that we want a range of technologies. Energy security will come from diversity, and we are committed to driving forward the nuclear programme in a way that the previous Labour Government did not, but not to the exclusion or detriment of significant investment in a range of other technologies, including, importantly, renewables and energy efficiency.

Nicholas Dakin Portrait Nic Dakin (Scunthorpe) (Lab)
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

What are the Government doing to ensure that the investment in the renewable industry paid for by UK taxpayers and UK energy bill payers results in jobs in the UK, not jobs elsewhere?

Lord Barker of Battle Portrait Gregory Barker
- Hansard - -

That is a very good question. We are doing a great deal more than the previous Government. The London Array, for example, was a fantastic installation, but it is a shame that 80% of it was constructed and contracted abroad. We now have an industrial strategy. We are working in partnership with the industry to establish, mobilise and grow a supply chain here in the UK. Only if we have a really vibrant UK supply chain is the roll-out of renewables at scale genuinely sustainable.

Oral Answers to Questions

Debate between Lord Barker of Battle and Nicholas Dakin
Thursday 8th March 2012

(12 years, 8 months ago)

Commons Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text
Nicholas Dakin Portrait Nic Dakin (Scunthorpe) (Lab)
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

17. What recent assessment he has made of the level of investment in low-carbon technologies in the UK.

Lord Barker of Battle Portrait The Minister of State, Department of Energy and Climate Change (Gregory Barker)
- Hansard - -

In February, Ernst and Young upgraded the UK to fifth in the world for overall attractiveness for renewable energy investment. Cleantech Group estimated UK venture capital investment in clean technology in 2011 to be around $566 million, ranking us third in the world after the United States and China. We have forecast that 4 GW of renewable electricity will become operational in the coming year, which represents a doubling of installed capacity since May 2011.

Nicholas Dakin Portrait Nic Dakin
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

I thank the Minister for his reply. What measures are the Government taking to ensure that the UK supply chain for low-carbon technologies is properly backed and developed?

Lord Barker of Battle Portrait Gregory Barker
- Hansard - -

In advance of the establishment of the Green investment bank, Green Investment UK will, thanks to the Chancellor’s Budget, invest up to £775 million in the green economy in the next financial year alone. This will be a huge boost, along with the other proactive measures that the coalition is taking to boost green growth.

Feed-in Tariffs

Debate between Lord Barker of Battle and Nicholas Dakin
Thursday 9th February 2012

(12 years, 9 months ago)

Commons Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text

Urgent Questions are proposed each morning by backbench MPs, and up to two may be selected each day by the Speaker. Chosen Urgent Questions are announced 30 minutes before Parliament sits each day.

Each Urgent Question requires a Government Minister to give a response on the debate topic.

This information is provided by Parallel Parliament and does not comprise part of the offical record

Lord Barker of Battle Portrait Gregory Barker
- Hansard - -

Under the green deal and its supporting energy company obligation, a significant subsidy will be available for homes that are hard to treat, and I imagine that those cottages on Exmoor are exactly the sort of homes that would benefit from additional subsidy for solid-wall insulation.

Nicholas Dakin Portrait Nic Dakin (Scunthorpe) (Lab)
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

Businesses and consumers in my constituency will assume that the Minister’s “TLC” stands for “turbulence, losses and chaos”. The Government have already spent £66,400 on fighting this case in the courts. How much more public money will they waste before they put solar energy on a sustainable footing?

Lord Barker of Battle Portrait Gregory Barker
- Hansard - -

The proposal we have presented today means that we are indeed putting solar energy on a sustainable footing. What we are not going to do is give up trying to save the consumer £1.5 billion, which is what it would cost if our appeal to the Supreme Court did not succeed. We think that it is right to stand up for hard-pressed consumers, and we do not think it is right to over-inflate rewards for the few people who receive unnecessarily high rewards of 43p.