Terrorism Act 2000 (Proscribed Organisations) (Amendment) Order 2025

Debate between Lord Austin of Dudley and Lord Hain
Thursday 3rd July 2025

(2 days, 13 hours ago)

Lords Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text Read Debate Ministerial Extracts
Lord Hain Portrait Lord Hain (Lab)
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

I am making exactly that point. By the way, someone should be disciplined for permitting such an easy breach of security at a key military airfield such as Brize Norton. What if the Palestine Action protesters had been real terrorists? Imagine what would have happened then.

Lord Austin of Dudley Portrait Lord Austin of Dudley (Non-Afl)
- Hansard - -

There is nothing in this order that will prevent young people protesting about what Israel is doing in Gaza. It is pretty shocking to hear people compare Palestine Action with the suffragettes and Nelson Mandela. Is the noble Lord seriously suggesting that it is non-violent when people smash their way in armoured vehicles into factories where ordinary working people are at work and when security guards and police have been injured in such attacks with sledgehammers? That is not non-violent protest.

Lord Hain Portrait Lord Hain (Lab)
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

I am not suggesting that it is. I completely agree with the noble Lord, but there is a difference between that kind of action and the action generally taken by young supporters of Palestine Action. Whether or not I agree with it—I have never supported its activity—there is a great difference between that and terrorism. If you start labelling people as terrorists willy-nilly right across the board, you go down a very dangerous route.