(3 weeks, 1 day ago)
Grand CommitteeI am sorry to comment yet again, but it seems to me deeply ironic that people who oppose it, and of course the controversy, then complain about the controversy and say it should be built somewhere else. It also seems ironic that people who have, as the noble Lord, Lord Pickles, said, campaigned against it and caused the delays now say that the delays are a reason for siting it somewhere else. I do not understand these points.
I remind noble Lords that interventions should be brief and for points of clarification. Can we now proceed with the debate? Thank you.
(4 weeks, 1 day ago)
Grand CommitteeMy Lords, this is not a memorial for the Jewish community—
The noble Lord was not here at the start of the debate.
I was under the impression that you could speak even though you were not.
Well, perhaps somebody else might like to make the point that it is not a memorial for the Jewish community.