Debates between Lord Ahmad of Wimbledon and Baroness Kinnock of Holyhead during the 2010-2015 Parliament

Tanzania: North Mara Mine

Debate between Lord Ahmad of Wimbledon and Baroness Kinnock of Holyhead
Tuesday 26th November 2013

(10 years, 11 months ago)

Lords Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text
Lord Ahmad of Wimbledon Portrait Lord Ahmad of Wimbledon
- Hansard - -

I agree with the right reverend Prelate, and ABG—Barrick Gold—has taken various initiatives. Indeed, our high commissioner, on visiting the area, found that up to $12 million-worth has been spent on corporate social responsibility, including healthcare centres, schools and water boreholes. There is more to be done. For example, she pointed out that although there is a healthcare centre, it is not properly manned with healthcare professionals. We have taken this up with the local authorities, working with our EU partners on the ground.

Baroness Kinnock of Holyhead Portrait Baroness Kinnock of Holyhead (Lab)
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

My Lords, is the Minister aware that African Barrick Gold, which is a British company, has continued to rely on the Tanzanian police to provide security at the North Mara goldmine, despite the shocking number of gunshot deaths and injuries to local people? Will the Government put pressure on African Barrick Gold and insist that it respect the human rights of desperately poor and vulnerable people?

Lord Ahmad of Wimbledon Portrait Lord Ahmad of Wimbledon
- Hansard - -

My Lords, it is my understanding that Barrick Gold is actually a Canadian company, although it is listed on the London Stock Exchange. As for the other matter that the noble Baroness raises, I agree with her: of course it is important for all companies, including Barrick Gold, to work with the local people on the ground to ensure that any human rights violations are addressed. Secondly, I notice that the main purpose of people being there with Barrick Gold is employment, to ensure that local people get the opportunity to gain full employment.