Debates between Lord Cryer and James Paice during the 2010-2015 Parliament

Oral Answers to Questions

Debate between Lord Cryer and James Paice
Thursday 24th November 2011

(13 years ago)

Commons Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text Read Debate Ministerial Extracts
James Paice Portrait Mr Paice
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

I can assure my hon. Friend that I have had such discussions and will continue to have them. I can assure the House that overall, the supermarkets, and indeed much of the processing sector, are determined to comply with the spirit of the legislation and procure egg and egg product only from compliant cages. As I said, I may well make a further statement shortly.

Lord Cryer Portrait John Cryer (Leyton and Wanstead) (Lab)
- Hansard - -

T7. The Minister has consistently said that the review of the common fisheries policy is a golden opportunity, and he has said the same again today. Will he therefore make a promise to the House that the British fishing fleet will be larger at the next election than it was at the beginning of this Parliament?

Oral Answers to Questions

Debate between Lord Cryer and James Paice
Thursday 9th September 2010

(14 years, 2 months ago)

Commons Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text Read Debate Ministerial Extracts
James Paice Portrait Mr Paice
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

I am very much aware of the belief in many parts of the British farming industry that regulations are not applied elsewhere in Europe. I am going to be completely honest, as the House would expect, and say that I think some of those stories are slightly exaggerated. I have many friends and contacts in the farming industry elsewhere in Europe, and they complain just as vigorously about this. Nevertheless, my hon. Friend’s fundamental point is absolutely right. When a regulation is passed by Europe, it should be implemented and enforced equally across the whole of the Community, if we believe in fair trade and a single market.

Lord Cryer Portrait John Cryer (Leyton and Wanstead) (Lab)
- Hansard - -

Does the Minister think that the Agricultural Wages Board constitutes a burden or protection for vulnerable workers?

James Paice Portrait Mr Paice
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

We have already announced our intention to abolish the Agricultural Wages Board, which has gone unchanged for the past 50-plus years. It is entirely inflexible and unable to face up to modern needs. For example, a farmer is not even allowed to pay a worker a salary under the Agricultural Wages Order, which is nonsensical. We now have the minimum wage legislation, and it is only right that we should bring agricultural legislation into line with the rest.