Debates between Jeff Smith and Sajid Javid during the 2015-2017 Parliament

Oral Answers to Questions

Debate between Jeff Smith and Sajid Javid
Monday 18th July 2016

(7 years, 11 months ago)

Commons Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text
Jeff Smith Portrait Jeff Smith (Manchester, Withington) (Lab)
- Hansard - -

10. What steps the Government plan to take to ensure that the devolution of business rates does not adversely affect deprived areas.

Sajid Javid Portrait The Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government (Sajid Javid)
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

By the end of this Parliament, local government will retain 100% of taxes raised locally. There will be redistribution between councils, so that areas do not lose out on funding where they collect less in taxes.

Jeff Smith Portrait Jeff Smith
- Hansard - -

I agree with the Secretary of State that, as he said earlier, no council should lose out, so there will need to be some system of top-ups and tariffs. We also need to use the opportunity to incentivise areas to promote growth. How will the Government ensure that this does not become just an administrative exercise that leads to another complicated local government funding formula by another name?

Sajid Javid Portrait Sajid Javid
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

The hon. Gentleman’s constituency has already seen a 44% fall in the claimant count since 2010, and this is another way to try to boost local growth by having control over local taxes. He makes the important point that we should make sure that no council loses out, and that is why there will be this redistribution, but at the same time there will be more ways to promote local growth.

Oral Answers to Questions

Debate between Jeff Smith and Sajid Javid
Tuesday 30th June 2015

(8 years, 11 months ago)

Commons Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text Read Debate Ministerial Extracts
Jeff Smith Portrait Jeff Smith (Manchester, Withington) (Lab)
- Hansard - -

T2. Will the Secretary of State tell me what discussions he has had with the Secretary of State for Transport to ensure that business and growth do not suffer as a result of the delay to the electrification of the trans- Pennine line?

Sajid Javid Portrait Sajid Javid
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

I was disappointed by that recent news, because it is important that we continue to invest in infrastructure—not least for increased productivity and, therefore, jobs growth. I have not yet had a discussion with the Transport Secretary, but I am looking forward to doing so.