All 3 Debates between Baroness Laing of Elderslie and Michael Fallon

National Shipbuilding Strategy

Debate between Baroness Laing of Elderslie and Michael Fallon
Wednesday 6th September 2017

(7 years, 3 months ago)

Commons Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text Read Debate Ministerial Extracts
Baroness Laing of Elderslie Portrait Madam Deputy Speaker (Mrs Eleanor Laing)
- Hansard - -

Order. The hon. Gentleman had his say when he was on his feet. He must not continue to try to have a say while sitting down.

Michael Fallon Portrait Sir Michael Fallon
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

I think the hon. Gentleman is probably faintly embarrassed by the scale of our commitment to the Clyde and of the investment there.

The hon. Gentleman asked me a serious question about the affordability of the equipment programme more generally. Yes, part of the equipment programme will have to be funded through the efficiency savings that we in defence have to realise and put back into the equipment programme. That means being more efficient, modernising our processes—for example, getting rid of barracks and land we no longer need—and continuing to work more effectively. All of that gain will go back into the equipment programme and help to fund the frigate that his constituents are building.

Point of Order

Debate between Baroness Laing of Elderslie and Michael Fallon
Thursday 27th November 2014

(10 years, 1 month ago)

Commons Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text Read Debate Ministerial Extracts
Baroness Laing of Elderslie Portrait Madam Deputy Speaker (Mrs Eleanor Laing)
- Hansard - -

The hon. Gentleman is well aware that that is not a point of order for the Chair. However, the Defence Secretary is in his place and if he indicates to me that he wishes to make a point of order further to that point of order, which was not a point of order, I will of course invite him to do so.

Michael Fallon Portrait The Secretary of State for Defence (Michael Fallon)
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

Perhaps I should not probe too hard as to whether this is now a point of order, Madam Deputy Speaker, but let me just make it very clear that the reports the shadow Defence Secretary has been reading are completely incorrect.

Energy Bill

Debate between Baroness Laing of Elderslie and Michael Fallon
Wednesday 4th December 2013

(11 years ago)

Commons Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text
Baroness Laing of Elderslie Portrait Madam Deputy Speaker (Mrs Eleanor Laing)
- Hansard - -

The hon. Lady has made her point and I am sure that those whom she wishes to have heard it have done so, but she will appreciate that it is not a matter with which the Chair can deal at this moment in the Chamber.

Clause 1

Decarbonisation target range

Michael Fallon Portrait Michael Fallon
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

I beg to move, That this House agrees with Lords amendment 1.

Baroness Laing of Elderslie Portrait Madam Deputy Speaker (Mrs Eleanor Laing)
- Hansard - -

With this it will be convenient to discuss the following:

Lords amendments 2 to 75.

Lords amendment 76, and amendment (a) thereto.

Lords amendments 77 to 86.

Lords amendment 87, and amendments (a), (g) and (b) to (f) thereto.

Lords amendments 88 to 104.

Lords amendments 106 to 113.

Michael Fallon Portrait Michael Fallon
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

As you have said, Madam Deputy Speaker, there are many amendments in this group and I will try to be as brief as possible in explaining each set.

The first set, amendments 1 to 15 and amendment 90, extend the decarbonisation provisions to Northern Ireland in order that any decarbonisation target range would cover the whole of the UK power sector. That was always our intention, but it was right that we should seek the agreement of the Northern Ireland Executive before making these amendments. The Assembly has since passed a legislative consent motion to confirm its support.

Turning to part 2 of the Bill, Lords amendments 25, 27 and 29 give effect to three substantive changes to contracts for difference. The remaining amendments on this topic—amendments 16, 19, 22, 23, 26, 28 and 30 to 34—are consequential.