All 6 Debates between Earl of Courtown and Lord Foulkes of Cumnock

Thu 10th Mar 2022
Elections Bill
Lords Chamber

Lords Hansard - Part 1 & Committee stage: Part 1
Fri 23rd Mar 2018
Wed 29th Jun 2016
Wed 9th Sep 2015

Elections Bill

Debate between Earl of Courtown and Lord Foulkes of Cumnock
Lord Foulkes of Cumnock Portrait Lord Foulkes of Cumnock (Lab Co-op)
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

My Lords, we have only done two of these amendments.

Earl of Courtown Portrait The Earl of Courtown (Con)
- Hansard - -

As my noble friend the Minister quietly reminds me, the amendments will be moved in their place on the Marshalled List.

Privileges and Conduct

Debate between Earl of Courtown and Lord Foulkes of Cumnock
Thursday 15th November 2018

(5 years, 12 months ago)

Lords Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text
Lord Foulkes of Cumnock Portrait Lord Foulkes of Cumnock (Lab)
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

Many of us do not live in London and we have to get to other parts of the United Kingdom. We are hearing the same arguments again and again. Surely it is about time that we went to the vote.

Earl of Courtown Portrait The Earl of Courtown (Con)
- Hansard - -

My Lords, for the convenience of the House, I suggest that we hear from my noble friends Lord Hodgson and Lady Shackleton, and then we move on to the noble Lord, Lord McFall.

Passports

Debate between Earl of Courtown and Lord Foulkes of Cumnock
Friday 23rd March 2018

(6 years, 7 months ago)

Lords Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text
Earl of Courtown Portrait The Earl of Courtown
- Hansard - -

My Lords, I thank my noble friend for his question. He rather put words into my mouth in certain areas. What is really important in this issue is to ensure that we get value for money for the taxpayer, as I am sure my noble friend would agree. He must also be aware—I am sure I have heard him say as much in the Chamber and I would be very surprised if I had not—how important it is that the UK is now a global country and able to seek the best deal for the taxpayer for this sort of contract. This is a good contract. It will save the taxpayer money. All these contracts have to go through a commercial process. In this case, as I said, jobs will be created in this country by this new contract.

Lord Foulkes of Cumnock Portrait Lord Foulkes of Cumnock (Lab)
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

My Lords, the Minister talks as though the contract has already been concluded. My understanding, from those involved in submitting bids, is that it has not been concluded and there is an opportunity for the Government to think again. Will he go back to his Secretary of State—that is as much as I can ask him—and say that, on both sides of this House, there is a desire that this should be reviewed in the name not just of security but of national pride.

Earl of Courtown Portrait The Earl of Courtown
- Hansard - -

My Lords, I thank the noble Lord for that question. As far as the process of tendering is concerned, the three bidders were notified of the outcome of the competition on 21 March. Following the notification, there is a regulatory standstill period of a minimum of 10 days before the contract can be signed. A public announcement to confirm the winning bidder will be made once the contract has formally been awarded. I also note what the noble Lord said and I will ensure that the Minister is aware of his concerns.

European Council

Debate between Earl of Courtown and Lord Foulkes of Cumnock
Wednesday 29th June 2016

(8 years, 4 months ago)

Lords Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text Read Debate Ministerial Extracts
Earl of Courtown Portrait The Earl of Courtown
- Hansard - -

I apologise to the noble Baroness. We have had 20 minutes of Back-Bench debate on this and we will now move on to the next Statement.

--- Later in debate ---
Earl of Courtown Portrait The Earl of Courtown
- Hansard - -

Order, order.

Earl of Courtown Portrait The Earl of Courtown
- Hansard - -

My Lords, will the noble Lord give way? The whole House is perfectly aware of his thoughts on this matter but, in this instance, we are moving on to the other Statement now.

Trade Union Bill

Debate between Earl of Courtown and Lord Foulkes of Cumnock
Monday 8th February 2016

(8 years, 9 months ago)

Lords Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text
Lord Balfe Portrait Lord Balfe
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

I shall be brief. I begin where the noble Lord, Lord Hain, ended, which is with the leaked letter. The points put by the noble Baroness, Lady Morgan, were extremely well made. There are clearly a whole number of issues within the Bill. If we are to believe the leaked letter, which I probably do, and as we are not going to vote tonight, I hope that the Minister will look very carefully at all these amendments with a view to coming back and assuring the House that, if we asked to sustain our opposition to them, she has firm advice from the Attorney-General that that will stand up in court. I am not afraid of our occasionally going to the Supreme Court to clarify matters—I think it is probably necessary in a devolution settlement—but we should be on firm ground. If we do go to the Supreme Court, we should have a recommendation from the Attorney-General that he is quite satisfied that legally we are in the right in what we do.

When it comes to things such as deductions of contributions at source, about which at another opportunity I shall make some very clear points, if devolution means anything, surely it does not mean that we are going to ask Cardiff hospital, for example, to stop deducting the subscriptions of their union members if that is done at no cost to public funds and is seen as beneficial to industrial relations in Wales. What does devolution mean if simple things like that cannot happen? Maybe they cannot happen but, if that is the case, I hope that the Minister will be prepared to publish and share with us the views of our Attorney-General as to why this is a sound clause.

Earl of Courtown Portrait The Earl of Courtown
- Hansard - -

My Lords, I think that it is the turn of the noble Lord, Lord Wigley, whose name is added to the amendment.

Lord Foulkes of Cumnock Portrait Lord Foulkes of Cumnock
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

What about Scotland?

Sudan

Debate between Earl of Courtown and Lord Foulkes of Cumnock
Wednesday 9th September 2015

(9 years, 2 months ago)

Lords Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text
Lord Foulkes of Cumnock Portrait Lord Foulkes of Cumnock (Lab)
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

Does the Minister accept that the problem of refugees relates not just to people fleeing oppression in Syria? There are refugees from many countries in Africa, including Sudan. Does he agree with what Peter Sutherland said at the weekend: that this is a problem not just for the European Union but for the whole world, and that other countries including Australia, Canada and the United States ought to be mobilised to help in the way that we did for the Vietnamese boat people?

Earl of Courtown Portrait The Earl of Courtown
- Hansard - -

I did not read the piece that the noble Lord mentioned, but it is a matter for the whole world. Some refugees from Sudan come from Sudan but others travel through it from Eritrea and other countries.