Point of Order Debate

Full Debate: Read Full Debate
Department: Leader of the House

Point of Order

Lord Grayling Excerpts
Thursday 4th February 2016

(8 years, 9 months ago)

Commons Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text Read Debate Ministerial Extracts
John Bercow Portrait Mr Speaker
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

Does the Leader of the House wish to respond?

Lord Grayling Portrait The Leader of the House of Commons (Chris Grayling)
- Hansard - -

Can I just say that the shadow Leader of the House is talking absolute nonsense?

John Bercow Portrait Mr Speaker
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

Right. Pursuant to the hon. Gentleman’s point of order, I can say only, at this stage, that I have no knowledge of the matter. I heard what the Leader of the House has said. I think it is a fair point to make to the House as a whole that it is not obligatory, but it is desirable, for words uttered to be genuinely meant. On one or two occasions in the past, I have come across language used such as “Second Reading of a Bill” which turns out really just to be a kind of holding statement, if you will, and what eventually transpires is something somewhat different—perhaps quite specifically not a Bill, and not a Second Reading of a Bill, but something else. On a serious note, in terms of the intelligibility of the proceedings of the House and the transparency with which we operate, I know that the Leader of the House will want to hold himself to a rather higher standard than that, and I am sure we can be assured of that.