Debates between Chloe Smith and Tom Tugendhat during the 2015-2017 Parliament

European Union Referendum Bill

Debate between Chloe Smith and Tom Tugendhat
Thursday 18th June 2015

(9 years, 3 months ago)

Commons Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text Read Debate Ministerial Extracts
Chloe Smith Portrait Chloe Smith
- Hansard - -

I take that point, but I still think the evidence is mixed. We have one—very strong—example. Ruth Davidson is one Conservative, and I am another, who reflects positively on that experience and thinks that we should learn from it, but other evidence in this arena is scant and not concrete.

Tom Tugendhat Portrait Tom Tugendhat
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

I thank my hon. Friend for giving way and allowing me to make a point in response to the hon. Member for Arfon (Hywel Williams). In fact, the evidence is not quite as clear as he suggests. The Scottish referendum was on a simple yes/no question and we know that such questions attract higher turnouts of every age, so the question whether 16 and 17-year-olds’ participation attracted a higher turnout is moot.

Chloe Smith Portrait Chloe Smith
- Hansard - -

My hon. Friend places me in a difficult position. As he was responding to the hon. Member for Arfon, he will have to allow me to skip his intervention and return to my speech.

Tom Tugendhat Portrait Tom Tugendhat
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

Sorry, I apologise.

Chloe Smith Portrait Chloe Smith
- Hansard - -

If I may, Mr Howarth, I will suggest that the two hon. Members sort themselves out. [Laughter.]

--- Later in debate ---
Chloe Smith Portrait Chloe Smith
- Hansard - -

The hon. Gentleman kindly brings me to my next point, which is the nature of making a change as important and as necessary as this through an ad hoc means. I am arguing for a lasting change for young people, not for an ad hoc change, as represented by making it on a one-time referendum. As good as referendums are, they are by their nature one-timers.

Tom Tugendhat Portrait Tom Tugendhat
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

I fully agree that there is a strong argument for lowering the voting age in this country and I would welcome a full debate on the issue in this place in due course, but I am not sure whether the British public, who have waited more than 40 years for a referendum on Europe, would forgive us for squabbling over the franchise at this point. Does my hon. Friend agree that a full and frank discussion about the enfranchisement of 16 and 17-year-olds is needed in this place in the fullness of time and that such a discussion should not be rushed?

Chloe Smith Portrait Chloe Smith
- Hansard - -

My hon. Friend is exactly right: we should do this properly. The Bill is not the place for that.