Debates between Baroness Young of Old Scone and Lord Beecham during the 2015-2017 Parliament

Housing and Planning Bill

Debate between Baroness Young of Old Scone and Lord Beecham
Tuesday 8th March 2016

(8 years, 8 months ago)

Lords Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text
Lord Beecham Portrait Lord Beecham
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

It is not about how the Government reached that figure but what, in their eyes, would be an acceptable increase in cost to provide the result the amendment seeks to achieve. If £3,000 is too much, what would be acceptable?

Baroness Young of Old Scone Portrait Baroness Young of Old Scone
- Hansard - -

I wonder whether the Minister might clear up a confusion that is arising in my mind. It strikes me that we are not talking about a cost that falls upon the builders of these homes, because it will be reflected in their price. The point we are making is that, if an additional cost of £3,500 would genuinely be passed on to the purchaser of the home, within a period of less than three years they would have recouped that amount and be in profit thereafter, for however long they stayed in that home. It is not about an undue burden on the builders, but about trying to remove an undue burden on the purchasers and residents of those homes in perpetuity.