Costs of Living Debate
Full Debate: Read Full DebateBaroness Watkins of Tavistock
Main Page: Baroness Watkins of Tavistock (Crossbench - Life peer)Department Debates - View all Baroness Watkins of Tavistock's debates with the Department for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy
(3 years, 5 months ago)
Lords Chamber Lord Callanan (Con)
        
    
    
    
    
    
        
        
        
            Lord Callanan (Con) 
        
    
        
    
        My noble friend makes an important point. The best thing we can do to ensure security of supply is to generate more of our supply here in the UK. For that, we need to keep producing as much oil and gas as we can from the North Sea during the transition period, and to ramp up the amount of homegrown renewables and nuclear, which we are also doing.
 Baroness Watkins of Tavistock (CB)
        
    
    
    
    
    
        
        
        
            Baroness Watkins of Tavistock (CB) 
        
    
        
    
        My Lords, some of the Government’s current plans to improve the situation—I recognise that that is what they are trying to do—will not necessarily benefit those who are on disability benefits. We must accept that people who cannot move easily in order to stay warm demand greater help with the resource of fuel. Will the Minister please comment on that?
 Lord Callanan (Con)
        
    
    
    
    
    
        
        
        
            Lord Callanan (Con) 
        
    
        
    
        The noble Baroness is referring to the warm home discount. We are increasing the amount of money generated for the warm home discount and it is going to a wider cohort of people, but we are trying to concentrate those payments on those who need them most.