All 1 Debates between Baroness Twycross and Lord Doyle

Mon 14th Sep 2026

Public Inquiries

Debate between Baroness Twycross and Lord Doyle
Monday 14th September 2026

(2 weeks, 1 day ago)

Lords Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text Read Debate Ministerial Extracts
Baroness Twycross Portrait Baroness Twycross (Lab)
- View Speech - Hansard - -

I would be very happy to meet the noble Baroness, Lady Brinton, about the proposal. I understand her concerns about some of the issues that happened with the infected blood compensation schemes and the support schemes previously, having been briefed on those since I became a Minister in the Cabinet Office. We share the ambition of your Lordships and of the Infected Blood Inquiry that fair compensation is delivered as quickly as possible to every eligible person. That has not always felt as easy when there have been compensation schemes, and we want to actively look at ways we can make that feel more victim-centred rather than too bureaucratic.

Lord Doyle Portrait Lord Doyle (Non-Afl)
- View Speech - Hansard - - - Excerpts

My Lords, given recent scandals, it is perhaps not surprising that the public regard judge-led statutory public inquiries as the necessary standard. However, this is not always proportionate. Have the Government given consideration to how they can build confidence in other routes for the public, so that people can still get to truth and justice?

Baroness Twycross Portrait Baroness Twycross (Lab)
- View Speech - Hansard - -

We have an inquiry team within the Cabinet Office that has a formal role advising departments and Ministers both on potential new inquiries and terms of reference, and it also gives advice across government on different routes. We are keen to look at what more we can do to advise the public and campaigners of the different options available. I would be happy to update your Lordships’ House at a future date when we have made more progress with this work.