(8Â years, 6Â months ago)
Lords ChamberI wanted to develop the noble and learned Lordâs theme of recognising the objection then allowing someone else in the chainâin the pool of servicesâto take that on. However, Clause 1(2) says that:
âFor the purposes of subsection (1) ⌠âparticipating in an activityâ includes any supervision, delegation, planning or supporting of staffâ,
so that would prohibit the very approach the noble and learned Lord has outlined. In addition, not that I belong to any religious group at all, but Buddhists approach these issues with the concept of right belief, right livelihood.
My Lords, to add to that, in the debate at Second Reading, the noble and learned Lord suggested that there need to be amendments to the Bill, but the movers of the Bill have not brought forward any of those amendments to allow us to have that discussion.