To match an exact phrase, use quotation marks around the search term. eg. "Parliamentary Estate". Use "OR" or "AND" as link words to form more complex queries.


Keep yourself up-to-date with the latest developments by exploring our subscription options to receive notifications direct to your inbox

Written Question
Ofsted: Public Appointments
Thursday 28th April 2022

Asked by: Baroness Taylor of Bolton (Labour - Life peer)

Question to the Department for Education:

To ask Her Majesty's Government through what process the post of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills is filled; what the term of appointment is; whether the appointment is renewable; and if so, how many times the appointment can be renewed.

Answered by Baroness Barran

It has not proved possible to respond to this question in the time available before Prorogation. Ministers will correspond directly with the Member.


Written Question
Coronavirus: Protective Clothing and Screening
Tuesday 28th September 2021

Asked by: Baroness Taylor of Bolton (Labour - Life peer)

Question to the HM Treasury:

To ask Her Majesty's Government what estimate they have made of the potential revenue of introducing a windfall tax on companies supplying (1) PPE, and (2) private COVID-19 tests.

Answered by Lord Agnew of Oulton

It is right that, as the economy rebounds, those best able to contribute share in the task of restoring the public finances to a sustainable footing.

That is why, at Budget, the Chancellor announced an increase in the Corporation Tax (CT) rate from 19 per cent to 25 per cent from 2023 onwards. This will, by definition, only apply to companies that are making profits, and profitable businesses have continued to pay CT throughout the pandemic.


Written Question
Courts: Coronavirus
Monday 8th February 2021

Asked by: Baroness Taylor of Bolton (Labour - Life peer)

Question to the Ministry of Justice:

To ask Her Majesty's Government, further to the Written Answer by Baroness Scott of Bybrook on 23 December 2020 (HL11501), what is the parent court for each Nightingale court; and what was (1) the number of days sat in each parent court from 1 January 2019 to the date on which its Nightingale court opened, and (2) the number of days sat in each parent court from the date on which its Nightingale court opened.

Answered by Lord Wolfson of Tredegar

We have now opened Nightingale courts at 21 locations bringing the total number of temporary court rooms set up nationwide to 40. These additional temporary courtrooms have allowed us to increase capacity, particularly for jury trials, in locations where there is an operational requirement and hold additional hearings within a safe environment.

A list of Nightingale parent courts and the number of days sat in each parent court is provided in the table below using the latest available validated data.

Table showing data on sitting days covering the period 1 January 2019 to 30 November 2020

Parent Court(s)

Associated Nightingale Court

Nightingale Court Open Date

Sitting Day1 Total in Parent Court Only before Nightingale Court (Jan 2019 - Nightingale Court Open Date)

Sitting Day 1Total in Parent Court Only after Nightingale Court (Nightingale Court Open Date - Nov 2020)

Worthing Magistrates' and County Court

East Pallant House

20/07/20

1743

421

Southwark Crown Court

Prospero House

03/08/20

3540

628

Swansea Crown Court (St Helen's)

Swansea Civic Centre

17/08/20

1308

214

Telford Justice Centre2

Former County Court at Telford

17/08/20

1967

315

Teesside Combined Court

Middlesbrough Town Hall

18/08/20

5275

817

Blackpool County Court

Former Magistrates court Fleetwood

24/08/20

1027

92

Blackpool Magistrates' Court

Former Magistrates court Fleetwood

24/08/20

1748

253

East London Family Court

102 Petty France

24/08/20

3732

614

Leeds Combined Court

Cloth Hall Court

28/08/20

8991

1130

Luton Crown Court

Knights' chamber and visitor centre Peterborough Cathedral

28/08/20

1435

280

York County Court

York, Hilton hotel

28/09/20

1736

195

Manchester Crown Court (Crown Square)

The Lowry theatre, Salford

28/09/20

3927

357

Manchester Crown Court (Minshull street)

The Lowry theatre, Salford

28/09/20

2691

235

Manchester tribunal3

The Lowry theatre, Salford

28/09/20

5299

443

Teesside Combined Court (Middlesbrough County Court)

Middlesbrough, Jury's Inn hotel

28/09/20

5559

521

Chester Crown Court

Chester, Chester Town Hall

19/10/20

1465

116

Bristol Crown Court

Bristol Law Society

19/10/20

2881

145

Bristol Civil Justice Centre

Bristol Law Society

19/10/20

5782

361

Queen Elizabeth II Law Courts

Liverpool, St Georges Hall

26/10/20

8317

548

Winchester Combined Court

Winchester Guild Hall

26.10.20

1975

124

1. If a courtroom has been used at all on a given day, we count that as 1 ‘day sat’

2. Includes Telford Justice Centre Annex

3. Manchester Tribunals: Includes Alexandra House – Manchester Tribunal and Piccadilly Exchange – Manchester Tribunal

Data and management information can change over time and are not subject to the same level of checks as official statistics. Although care is taken when processing and analysing the data, the details are subject to inaccuracies inherent in any large-scale case management system and is the best data that is available.

Ensuring that we can operate safely during the Covid-19 pandemic is our top priority. We have put in place measures in our court rooms so that they can hold Covid-19 secure trials, moved to virtual hearings where possible and opened additional court rooms in Nightingale courts as part of a package to increase available capacity.


Written Question
HM Courts and Tribunals Service: Databases
Monday 8th February 2021

Asked by: Baroness Taylor of Bolton (Labour - Life peer)

Question to the Ministry of Justice:

To ask Her Majesty's Government, further to the Written Answer by Baroness Scott of Bybrook on 4 January (HL11555), (1) how much funding has been made available from the budget of the Reform Programme, and (2) how much money has been allocated from Administrative Data Research UK, for implementing the recommendations of the report by Dr Natalie Byrom Making the most of HMCTS data: HMCTS’ full response and update to Dr Byrom’s recommendations, published on 9 October 2020.

Answered by Lord Wolfson of Tredegar

Dr Byrom’s report makes a number of important recommendations which HMCTS is in the process of implementing. Because HMCTS’s response to the recommendations is integrated into the wider work on reviewing data use and management, spending is included in departmental and programme budgets. As such, it is not possible to disaggregate work on the recommendations from other work on data. In addition to spending from these departmental and programme budgets, HMCTS has allocated £4.92m of reform funding specifically to implementing our Data Strategy in 2020/2021.HMCTS budgets for future years have not yet been set.

ADR UK awarded MoJ a grant of £2.89m over three years for the data-linking programme Data First to facilitate and promote research in the area of justice. This work was commissioned for overall strategic aims of ADR UK and Data First and not specifically to address the recommendations from the Byrom report.


Written Question
Courts: Coronavirus
Monday 8th February 2021

Asked by: Baroness Taylor of Bolton (Labour - Life peer)

Question to the Ministry of Justice:

To ask Her Majesty's Government, further to the Written Answer by Baroness Scott of Bybrook on 23 December 2020 (HL11500), how they assess the (1) effectiveness, and (2) value for money, of Nightingale courts; and on what basis the decision was taken in December 2020 to open nine more Nightingale courts.

Answered by Lord Wolfson of Tredegar

Nightingale courts provide much needed additional capacity for face-to-face hearings in a Covid-safe environment and contribute greatly for our response to the Covid-19 pandemic. As part of our recovery plans, we are working towards establishing a total of 60 additional court rooms through Nightingale courts by the end of March 2021.

When considering Nightingale courts, we assess where the need is greatest and look for suitable venues based on hearing capacity, whether building alterations are required, safety and security and length of hire. We consider the cost of provision, using public buildings where these are available and suitable, and each venue is assessed for value for money before final decisions are made.

Cases are listed in Nightingale courts in the same way as our permanent estate, and at similar utilisation rates.


Written Question
Remote Hearings
Thursday 21st January 2021

Asked by: Baroness Taylor of Bolton (Labour - Life peer)

Question to the Ministry of Justice:

To ask Her Majesty's Government whether they collect data on people's experience of remote court hearings; and, if not, what plans they have to do so.

Answered by Lord Wolfson of Tredegar

HM Courts and Tribunals Service (HMCTS) are evaluating the use of remote hearings during the Covid-19 outbreak. This will include a large-scale survey of over 5000 public users, capturing their experiences of and attitudes to remote hearings. Survey findings will be supplemented by in-depth interviews with users on their experiences. HMCTS will publish the findings of the evaluation once it is complete and has been quality assured.

In addition, as part of HMCTS’s ongoing perceptions work, all users can complete a short feedback survey on how they found their remote hearing.

HMCTS are also continuing to develop the Video Hearings Service as part of Reform. The Video Hearings Service is being tested in a small number of courts, and HMCTS are conducting research with users on their experiences to inform development of the service.


Written Question
Family Proceedings
Monday 4th January 2021

Asked by: Baroness Taylor of Bolton (Labour - Life peer)

Question to the Ministry of Justice:

To ask Her Majesty's Government how many family law cases were outstanding in each month of this year.

Answered by Baroness Scott of Bybrook - Parliamentary Under Secretary of State (Department for Levelling Up, Housing and Communities)

HM Courts and Tribunals Service publishes management information on workload and timeliness within the family courts on a monthly basis. This includes the number of outstanding cases which have been receipted but not yet disposed of at the end of each month.

The following table details the number of private family law (children) cases and public family law cases outstanding at the end of each month of this year. This presents the most current data at the time of responding.

Month

Private Family Law – outstanding cases

Public Family Law – outstanding cases

January 2020

51,906

18,841

February 2020

53,844

19,367

March 2020

56,378

19,958

April 2020

58,819

19,626

May 2020

62,528

20,478

June 2020

66,271

21,156

July 2020

69,993

21,915

August 2020

73,126

22,390

September 2020

72,812

22,881

This information is extracted from HMCTS case management systems and as management information, it is not subject to the same quality assurance process as official statistics. The latest HMCTS management information report (October 2020) can be accessed at: https://www.gov.uk/government/statistical-data-sets/hmcts-management-information-october-2020.

The information relating to outstanding private family law case excludes applications made under the Family Law Act 1996. This information is not published.

Information about the volume of outstanding divorce applications each month is not published. However, this HMCTS management information report does contain other data about the management of divorce applications.


Written Question
Repossession Orders
Monday 4th January 2021

Asked by: Baroness Taylor of Bolton (Labour - Life peer)

Question to the Ministry of Justice:

To ask Her Majesty's Government how many house repossession claims were outstanding in each month since March this year.

Answered by Baroness Scott of Bybrook - Parliamentary Under Secretary of State (Department for Levelling Up, Housing and Communities)

The requested information is not held by HMCTS. Some possession claims do not progress because they have concluded by other means without the court being notified (for example because the Defendant has left the property or paid any arrears) and for this reason outstanding volumes cannot be calculated.


Written Question
Courts: Standards
Monday 4th January 2021

Asked by: Baroness Taylor of Bolton (Labour - Life peer)

Question to the Ministry of Justice:

To ask Her Majesty's Government what targets they have set, if any, for reducing the backlog of outstanding cases across courts and tribunals in England and Wales.

Answered by Baroness Scott of Bybrook - Parliamentary Under Secretary of State (Department for Levelling Up, Housing and Communities)

HMCTS has published an update on their response to Covid-19 in the criminal courts, Civil and Family Courts and Tribunals in England and Wales, please see attached.

This provides a comprehensive update on recovery plans and the work being undertaken to restore capacity. This includes installing plexiglass screens to make the estate COVID-secure, recruiting additional staff and establishing Nightingale courts.


Written Question
HM Courts and Tribunals Service: Databases
Monday 4th January 2021

Asked by: Baroness Taylor of Bolton (Labour - Life peer)

Question to the Ministry of Justice:

To ask Her Majesty's Government whether there is a timetable for implementing the recommendations they accepted in their response to the report by Dr Natalie Byrom Making the most  of HMCTS data: HMCTS’ full response and update to Dr Byrom’s recommendations, published on 9 October.

Answered by Baroness Scott of Bybrook - Parliamentary Under Secretary of State (Department for Levelling Up, Housing and Communities)

HMCTS published a full response and progress update in October 2020 to Dr Byrom’s report Digital Justice: HMCTS data strategy and delivering access to justice. The response is attached and is also available here: https://www.gov.uk/government/news/hmcts-response-and-progress-update-on-dr-natalie-byrom-report and details HMCTS response and progress made to date on each of the 29 recommendations.

The response confirms timelines for the collection of protected characteristics data; for starting to share data with academic researchers and others as part of the Data First project, and for the development of our approach to open and shared data.