Debates between Baroness Swinburne and Lord Watson of Wyre Forest during the 2019-2024 Parliament

Wed 27th Mar 2024

Building Safety

Debate between Baroness Swinburne and Lord Watson of Wyre Forest
Wednesday 27th March 2024

(8 months, 3 weeks ago)

Lords Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text Read Debate Ministerial Extracts
Baroness Swinburne Portrait Baroness Swinburne (Con)
- View Speech - Hansard - -

Again, I will ensure that the department briefs us and we will be able to come back in writing on the situation in Barnet. I will check what the independent individual has told us with regard to that risk to life and whether that involves an assessment of the time of day. I am afraid I do not have that information, but I am sure somebody in the department does.

Lord Watson of Wyre Forest Portrait Lord Watson of Wyre Forest (Lab)
- View Speech - Hansard - - - Excerpts

My Lords, I seek a little more clarity on timelines. Do the Government have a deadline by which remediation must be complete? If they do, what is it? If they do not, does the Minister think it is sensible to set one?

Baroness Swinburne Portrait Baroness Swinburne (Con)
- View Speech - Hansard - -

At this point, “as soon as possible” is the deadline and therefore no excuse is a good enough excuse for this not to be happening in any identified building right now, in order to ensure that people are safe. As to whether it needs to happen as this progresses, we have doubled the number of buildings that have been made safe in the last year. If that does not continue to progress and, indeed, potentially quicken, then, on that basis, I imagine that the department will start to investigate whether other measures are needed.

--- Later in debate ---
Baroness Swinburne Portrait Baroness Swinburne (Con)
- View Speech - Hansard - -

If there are instances where that is the case, then you can either work with our department, or directly through the Association of British Insurers to alert them to the fact that it is happening. There is an agreement with insurance companies that, if remediation work has been done, the insurance premiums should not be excessive.

With regards to other parts of the insurance market and those buildings which have not yet had full remediation work done, they are also expected to be working with residents to ensure that insurance is affordable. There is a fire-safety reinsurance facility led by the Association of British Insurers, which reinsurance brokers can utilise. There are a number of insurance-led schemes which are supposed to be helping. If noble Lords know of any instances where they are not, please let us know.

Lord Watson of Wyre Forest Portrait Lord Watson of Wyre Forest (Lab)
- View Speech - Hansard - - - Excerpts

Can the Minister say if there is an intention in government to seek recompense for the taxpayer from the people who are responsible for this crisis?

Baroness Swinburne Portrait Baroness Swinburne (Con)
- View Speech - Hansard - -

We believe that those responsible for these buildings need to be the ones who ultimately pay for this, so the answer is yes.

--- Later in debate ---
Baroness Swinburne Portrait Baroness Swinburne (Con)
- View Speech - Hansard - -

In the first instance, I suggest that they go to their insurance company directly and notify it of the requirement that this should be fair and assessed based upon the existing current risk rather than prior risk. If that does not yield results and the ABI is unable to help, I am more than happy, as the Minister here, to have those sent to me.

Lord Watson of Wyre Forest Portrait Lord Watson of Wyre Forest (Lab)
- View Speech - Hansard - - - Excerpts

Since there is time, and on this very important point, is the department monitoring the rise in insurance premiums in these properties to allow Ministers to make appropriate policy decisions, and should the ABI not honour its commitments?

Baroness Swinburne Portrait Baroness Swinburne (Con)
- View Speech - Hansard - -

I do not know the explicit answer to that. I will check, and anything comes to light that suggests that we are not, I will come back to the House, but I imagine that we are, and if not, I will revert.