Debates between Baroness Stowell of Beeston and Viscount Younger of Leckie during the 2017-2019 Parliament

Fri 27th Oct 2017
Unpaid Work Experience (Prohibition) Bill [HL]
Lords Chamber

2nd reading (Hansard): House of Lords

Unpaid Work Experience (Prohibition) Bill [HL]

Debate between Baroness Stowell of Beeston and Viscount Younger of Leckie
2nd reading (Hansard): House of Lords
Friday 27th October 2017

(6 years, 6 months ago)

Lords Chamber
Read Full debate Unpaid Work Experience (Prohibition) Bill [HL] 2017-19 View all Unpaid Work Experience (Prohibition) Bill [HL] 2017-19 Debates Read Hansard Text
Viscount Younger of Leckie Portrait Viscount Younger of Leckie
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

We are not taking a view on that. We are saying that there is no definition of work experience and it is left for others to decide whether the work is proper work that deserves remuneration or whether it comes under the description of somebody coming in for a couple of days and looking over somebody’s shoulder.

Baroness Stowell of Beeston Portrait Baroness Stowell of Beeston
- Hansard - -

I wonder if I might assist my noble friend. One of the things I find quite helpful, from what he said in his remarks, is knowing that the Government are still considering how they will respond to Matthew Taylor’s report. I did not realise that until my noble friend said so. We have clearly had a very good debate, with some strong and forceful arguments. I would have thought quite a few of us would welcome the opportunity to sit down with the relevant Ministers—perhaps in BEIS—who are looking at and considering how to respond to the Taylor review, and have some real influence on the Government’s response to that set of recommendations.