Debates between Baroness Stowell of Beeston and Lord Sugar during the 2010-2015 Parliament

Carbon Monoxide Detectors

Debate between Baroness Stowell of Beeston and Lord Sugar
Wednesday 6th November 2013

(11 years ago)

Lords Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text
Baroness Stowell of Beeston Portrait Baroness Stowell of Beeston
- Hansard - -

My noble friend raises an interesting point. One of the new steps that the department is proposing as part of its wider review to enhance the safety of people in rented property is to ensure that they are properly equipped to ask the right questions about alarms and their longevity. Annual safety checks are about appliances and flues. The most important thing is that appliances are operating properly because, if they do so, the chance of injury or death is that much more diminished.

Lord Sugar Portrait Lord Sugar (Lab)
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

My Lords, the noble Baroness will of course be aware that some of the regretful deaths that have been caused by carbon monoxide poisoning in people’s homes is due to a device driven by gas. Does the noble Baroness agree that the utility companies that supply gas should be under a legal obligation to ensure that the supply and installation in the homes of their clients are tested and that their premises are safe and, perhaps, retrospectively fit a CO device free of charge? Of course, they can easily afford to do so.

Baroness Stowell of Beeston Portrait Baroness Stowell of Beeston
- Hansard - -

Appliances in rented properties are subject to an annual requirement for a gas safety check. As for the providers of gas pipes, since April this year the distribution network operators have been required by Ofgem to raise awareness and reduce the risk of carbon monoxide. So there is now a requirement on those companies as well as the annual safety check on the appliances which is part of existing regulations.