Debates between Baroness Rawlings and Lord Steel of Aikwood during the 2010-2015 Parliament

Mon 26th Mar 2012
Thu 11th Nov 2010

Scotland Bill

Debate between Baroness Rawlings and Lord Steel of Aikwood
Monday 26th March 2012

(12 years, 8 months ago)

Lords Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text Read Debate Ministerial Extracts
Baroness Rawlings Portrait Baroness Rawlings
- Hansard - -

My Lords, I beg to move that further consideration on Report be now adjourned. In doing so, may I tell the House that we shall not be having the Statement and suggest that Report should begin again not earlier than 10.25 pm?

Lord Steel of Aikwood Portrait Lord Steel of Aikwood
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

My Lords, I would like to protest at what is being proposed. It is quite ridiculous that on a Bill of this importance we should be asked to come back. We now have the debate of the noble Baroness, Lady Deech, which will take us to nearly 10.30 pm. It cannot seriously be proposed that we should continue from 10.30 pm until we get to Amendment 26, as it says on the Order Paper, from 10.30 pm. I gave notice that I was going to object when this Motion was moved. I gave notice several hours ago that we wanted to hear from the Government about what they proposed to do with the rest of Report.

Media: Ownership

Debate between Baroness Rawlings and Lord Steel of Aikwood
Thursday 11th November 2010

(14 years ago)

Lords Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text
Baroness Rawlings Portrait Baroness Rawlings
- Hansard - -

The noble Lord, Lord Borrie, asked this question in the debate. I thought that I had assured him that Ofcom is not going on to the scrapheap, but it will be reviewed. I can assure him that, although changes will be made to the economic network regulatory functions of Ofcom, it is not being scrapped.

Lord Steel of Aikwood Portrait Lord Steel of Aikwood
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

In reference to the third part of her Answer, does the Minister recall that, at the end of the excellent debate last Thursday, the noble Lord, Lord Puttnam, referred to a phrase used about the coalition by my noble friend Lord Razzall in saying that for some of us this issue would be a “significant marker”. Will she recognise that my noble friend was understating the case and that the transfer of ownership of a major television news station into the hands of the owner of four national newspapers, regardless of whose hands they are, would be an illiberal media outrage and wholly unacceptable?

Baroness Rawlings Portrait Baroness Rawlings
- Hansard - -

We had the debate last week, when we went through this. It is not in the hands of the Government; it is in the hands of the Secretary of State. It is in the hands of the Competition—