Baroness Neville-Rolfe
Main Page: Baroness Neville-Rolfe (Conservative - Life peer)Department Debates - View all Baroness Neville-Rolfe's debates with the Department of Health and Social Care
(5 years, 3 months ago)
Lords Chamber Lord Bethell
        
    
    
    
    
    
        
        
        
            Lord Bethell 
        
    
        
    
        I completely understand the history of the noble Baroness’s role at City Hall, but I completely push back against her characterisation of the Prime Minister’s intentions. He has made it very clear that he is incredibly grateful for the hard work and sacrifice of those who work in the care homes sector, and I think we can take him at his word on that.
 Baroness Neville-Rolfe (Con) [V]
        
    
    
    
    
    
        
        
        
            Baroness Neville-Rolfe (Con) [V] 
        
    
        
    
        There is a real degree of confusion about masks. Originally, Ministers said that they did not do much good; now, the President of the Royal Society claims they are essential. A study at Jena, west of Leipzig in Germany, underlines their value. Will my noble friend clarify the position and explain his reasoning?
 Lord Bethell
        
    
    
    
    
    
        
        
        
            Lord Bethell 
        
    
        
    
        The Government’s approach to the epidemic is to emphasise the three main pillars of our strategy: hygiene, social distancing and isolation. They are based on clear science and evidence. The issue of masks is highly contested. There is possibly a benefit from wearing masks—that is why we have put in place the requirement to wear masks on public transport—but the science remains clear that they are not a replacement for hygiene, social distancing or isolation. On that, we are clear.