Overseas Domestic Workers Visa Debate

Full Debate: Read Full Debate
Department: Home Office

Overseas Domestic Workers Visa

Baroness Kennedy of Cradley Excerpts
Monday 25th January 2016

(8 years, 10 months ago)

Lords Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text Read Debate Ministerial Extracts
Asked by
Baroness Kennedy of Cradley Portrait Baroness Kennedy of Cradley
- Hansard - -



To ask Her Majesty’s Government what plans they have to implement the recommendations of the independent review of the overseas domestic workers visa published on 17 December 2015.

Lord Bates Portrait The Minister of State, Home Office (Lord Bates) (Con)
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

My Lords, the Government are considering Mr Ewins’ recommendations very carefully. Our first concern is to ensure that we can both protect victims and bring perpetrators to justice. I have made it clear that we will return to this issue on Report of the Immigration Bill, with our considered views.

Baroness Kennedy of Cradley Portrait Baroness Kennedy of Cradley (Lab)
- Hansard - -

I thank the noble Lord, Lord Bates, for his reply. To be honest, it is disappointing to hear that, despite the Government having clear recommendations for action from their own review, which they commissioned during consideration of the Modern Slavery Bill, a further process of data collection and discussion with officials is proposed now that this issue is being raised as part of the Immigration Bill. Is this extra consultation the final hoop that we need to jump through, and will it be completed in good time for a final decision to be made on Report of the Immigration Bill?

Lord Bates Portrait Lord Bates
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

The report was published on 17 December, so we have had it during consideration of the Immigration Bill, which is obviously a more sensible legislative vehicle to carry any changes. James Ewins has put forward 34 recommendations, which we are looking at very carefully, and we appreciate his work. When we debated this in the Immigration Bill Committee last week, I said that, before Report, we would have a meeting of all interested Peers—with James Ewins—and the Government would produce their response and any proposed amendments to the legislation.