Mount Everest: Safety

Debate between Baroness Goldie and Lord Selkirk of Douglas
Thursday 18th July 2019

(4 years, 9 months ago)

Lords Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text
Baroness Goldie Portrait Baroness Goldie
- Hansard - -

Well, I already have a very long list of things that I have been asked to put to whoever the incoming leader and new Prime Minister is. I am sure that the successful incumbent will note the noble Lord’s observation with interest.

Lord Selkirk of Douglas Portrait Lord Selkirk of Douglas (Con)
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

My Lords, will the Minister accept that I have a personal interest, as my father was the first man in the world to fly over Mount Everest in 1933, when it was only just technically possible, and if he had not succeeded I would not be here today? Does the Minister accept that Everest is enormously dangerous for mountaineers? There are beliefs that there has been a substantial element of climate change, and full preparations are absolutely necessary for those who wish to do this.

Baroness Goldie Portrait Baroness Goldie
- Hansard - -

My noble friend makes some important points—not least that we owe his presence here today to his late father’s flight over Everest. I am trying to make a connection; it may take me a little time but no doubt I will manage. He makes an important point about climate change. There is evidence that Nepal is being affected by climate change; there has been very serious recent flooding. As my noble friend is aware, the UK is committed to tackling climate change. We are well placed to help Nepal to develop in a low-carbon way without sacrificing growth. Indeed, DfID Nepal offers substantial climate support, primarily through the Nepal climate change support programme and the Nepal renewable energy programme. DfID is also providing support for the important new development, the Arun III hydropower project.

Genocide Prevention

Debate between Baroness Goldie and Lord Selkirk of Douglas
Wednesday 27th February 2019

(5 years, 2 months ago)

Lords Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text
Lord Selkirk of Douglas Portrait Lord Selkirk of Douglas
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

To ask Her Majesty’s Government what assessment they have made of the United States’ Elie Wiesel Genocide and Atrocities Prevention Act, signed into law by the President of the United States on 14 January 2019; and what steps they are taking to help ensure the timely prevention of the genocide of religious minorities.

Baroness Goldie Portrait Baroness Goldie (Con)
- Hansard - -

My Lords, the UK does not normally comment on the policy of close allies—however, we welcome all efforts to help prevent mass atrocities. As a majority of mass atrocities occur in and around conflict, the Government believe that a focus on conflict prevention is the best means to prevent most mass atrocities. Through our diplomatic development, defence and law enforcement engagement, the UK participates in a range of international initiatives aimed at preventing atrocities.

Lord Selkirk of Douglas Portrait Lord Selkirk of Douglas (Con)
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

I thank the Minister for her reply. She will recall that it is 70 years since the United Nations General Assembly adopted the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide. Should the Government not consider the introduction of new legislation which would ensure that their response to genocide is as immediate and effective as possible, and which would also protect religious minority groups, including Christians?

Baroness Goldie Portrait Baroness Goldie
- Hansard - -

I thank my noble friend for a pertinent question. The UK’s work in this area is long-standing, both in preventing atrocities and in securing accountability and justice for atrocities committed. My noble friend will be aware that UK activity has in-built flexibility, both in identifying situations and in swiftness of response—for example, we work across early warning mechanisms and diplomacy, and from development to programmatic support to help with prevention work, and defence tools. That offers an effective and a swift response, where necessary, to any unfolding situation.

EU Withdrawal Agreement

Debate between Baroness Goldie and Lord Selkirk of Douglas
Monday 7th January 2019

(5 years, 4 months ago)

Lords Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text
Baroness Goldie Portrait Baroness Goldie
- Hansard - -

It is sometimes difficult to do, but if one climbs up to the top of the tree to get a bird’s-eye perspective on all this, it seems the scenario is fairly simply defined. The Prime Minister and the Government’s view is that a good deal—a solid and workable deal—has been negotiated, and that we should get on with accepting it and make progress. If that deal is not accepted, clearly the implication is that we may leave without a deal, following the process triggered by Article 50. At the end of the day, I emphasise to the noble Lord that it will not be for this House to determine how matters proceed, although the opinions in this House do matter. It will be for the House of Commons, which is sovereign, to come to its own determination on these matters.

Lord Selkirk of Douglas Portrait Lord Selkirk of Douglas (Con)
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

Does my noble friend accept that our countrymen and countrywomen are yearning for clarity, certainty and an end to the process? Then we could move on to the next stage of the future relationship or relationships with the EU and other countries.

Baroness Goldie Portrait Baroness Goldie
- Hansard - -

I thank my noble friend; I think he strikes a chord. There is certainly a sense of frustration throughout the country about the body politic in general, and I think there is a desire to see the process move on to a destination. I have been particularly interested in the response of the business community in Northern Ireland, which seems to think the deal is a positive contribution to that future. I very much hope that, when it comes to be voted on in the other place, there will be recognition that the deal is good for this country and a willingness to accept it.

Turkey: Kurds and Yazidis in Syria

Debate between Baroness Goldie and Lord Selkirk of Douglas
Wednesday 23rd May 2018

(5 years, 11 months ago)

Lords Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text
Baroness Goldie Portrait Baroness Goldie
- Hansard - -

As the noble Lord will be aware, the United Kingdom supported the United Nations Security Council resolution which called for a ceasefire across Syria, the only exception being continued operations against Daesh, al-Qaeda and other terrorist groups as designated by the Security Council. The noble Lord will also be aware that the United Nations-led Geneva process, which is the principal peace process mandated by the UNSCR, remains the forum for a lasting political settlement. We expect all parties to be able to participate in that forum.

Lord Selkirk of Douglas Portrait Lord Selkirk of Douglas (Con)
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

Can the Minister say what the nature is of the relationship between the British Government and the Turkish Government, bearing in mind that Turkey is a key strategic player in the region?

Baroness Goldie Portrait Baroness Goldie
- Hansard - -

I thank my noble friend for that observation. It is indeed the case that Turkey is a key ally of the United Kingdom and a vital strategic and trade partner. I remind your Lordships that, in the very recent airstrike to degrade the use and capability of chemical weapons in Syria, Turkey was very supportive and was a helpful ally.