Debates between Baroness Goldie and Lord Arbuthnot of Edrom during the 2019-2024 Parliament

Defence and Security Industrial Strategy

Debate between Baroness Goldie and Lord Arbuthnot of Edrom
Wednesday 24th March 2021

(3 years, 8 months ago)

Lords Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text Read Debate Ministerial Extracts
Lord Arbuthnot of Edrom Portrait Lord Arbuthnot of Edrom (Con) [V]
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

My Lords, I draw attention to my interests as set out in the register. This was a good review, which concentrated on many key points, including resilience. But is there not a risk that reducing the Regular Army reduces the connection between the Armed Forces and the public they serve, and hence reduces support for the Armed Forces and that very resilience we need to build up?

Baroness Goldie Portrait Baroness Goldie (Con)
- Hansard - -

My noble friend asks a very perceptive question. We are satisfied that, despite a reduction to 72,500, we still have a very significant cohort of professional military. We are satisfied that we can discharge all the obligations falling upon us, whether in conflict, peacekeeping, or MACA requests for domestic resilience at home.

We have seen, through the response by the Armed Forces to the Covid pandemic, what tremendous respect and affection the public have for our Armed Forces, and I hope that that will endure. There may be other occasions where we deploy our Armed Forces on MACA tasks or other civil support tasks at home, and that will reinforce not only the professionalism they possess but the affection with which the public rightly regard them