To match an exact phrase, use quotation marks around the search term. eg. "Parliamentary Estate". Use "OR" or "AND" as link words to form more complex queries.


Keep yourself up-to-date with the latest developments by exploring our subscription options to receive notifications direct to your inbox

Speech in Grand Committee - Tue 27 Apr 2021
Employment Rights Act 1996 (Protection from Detriment in Health and Safety Cases) (Amendment) Order 2021

"My Lords, having served for a number of years—about 20 I think—as a member of an industrial tribunal, I have a particular interest in this subject. I read with interest yesterday a Times article headed, “U-shaped pandemic jobs crisis hits older and younger workers”. My comments today focus on what …..."
Baroness Gardner of Parkes - View Speech

View all Baroness Gardner of Parkes (Con - Life peer) contributions to the debate on: Employment Rights Act 1996 (Protection from Detriment in Health and Safety Cases) (Amendment) Order 2021

Division Vote (Lords)
26 Apr 2021 - Overseas Operations (Service Personnel and Veterans) Bill - View Vote Context
Baroness Gardner of Parkes (Con) voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 230 Conservative No votes vs 1 Conservative Aye votes
Vote Tally: Ayes - 312 Noes - 243
Speech in Grand Committee - Mon 26 Apr 2021
Whiplash Injury Regulations 2021

"My Lords, I welcome the introduction of the whiplash injury regulations, given the sheer volume of whiplash claims that were being made to exploit the system, rather than to support those who suffered genuine injury. I do hope that, rather than just being absorbed by the insurance industry, any savings …..."
Baroness Gardner of Parkes - View Speech

View all Baroness Gardner of Parkes (Con - Life peer) contributions to the debate on: Whiplash Injury Regulations 2021

Written Question
Coronavirus: Vaccination
Monday 26th April 2021

Asked by: Baroness Gardner of Parkes (Conservative - Life peer)

Question to the Department of Health and Social Care:

To ask Her Majesty's Government what plans they have to ensure that the amount of time between the administration of the first and the second dose of the Pfizer/BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine does not exceed six weeks.

Answered by Lord Bethell

Since December 2020, the Government’s policy has been to offer people their second vaccine dose up to 12 weeks after their first dose. The decision to update the dosing interval will give as many people at the highest risk their first dose as soon as possible and it is in line with the conditions of authorisation from Medicines and Healthcare and Regulatory Authority for the vaccine.

This approach is based on advice from the Joint Committee on Vaccination and Immunisation and four UK Chief Medical Officers and is designed to save lives. Analysis carried out by Public Health England suggests that the COVID-19 vaccination programme prevented 6,100 deaths in England up to the end of February 2021.

The Government is in constant contact with the vaccine manufacturers and remains confident that the supply of vaccine to the UK will not be disrupted, and will enable everyone to receive their second dose within 12 weeks of their first.


Speech in Grand Committee - Thu 22 Apr 2021
Covid-19: Poverty and Mass Evictions

"My Lords, I was shocked to read that Citizens Advice had published a report which said that 58% of those who have now fallen behind on their rents were not in arrears before the Covid pandemic. Total arrears in January 2021 were estimated at £360 million. This has a knock-on …..."
Baroness Gardner of Parkes - View Speech

View all Baroness Gardner of Parkes (Con - Life peer) contributions to the debate on: Covid-19: Poverty and Mass Evictions

Division Vote (Lords)
21 Apr 2021 - Domestic Abuse Bill - View Vote Context
Baroness Gardner of Parkes (Con) voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 211 Conservative No votes vs 1 Conservative Aye votes
Vote Tally: Ayes - 291 Noes - 228
Division Vote (Lords)
21 Apr 2021 - Domestic Abuse Bill - View Vote Context
Baroness Gardner of Parkes (Con) voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 209 Conservative No votes vs 2 Conservative Aye votes
Vote Tally: Ayes - 292 Noes - 233
Division Vote (Lords)
21 Apr 2021 - Domestic Abuse Bill - View Vote Context
Baroness Gardner of Parkes (Con) voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 222 Conservative No votes vs 1 Conservative Aye votes
Vote Tally: Ayes - 307 Noes - 253
Division Vote (Lords)
21 Apr 2021 - Domestic Abuse Bill - View Vote Context
Baroness Gardner of Parkes (Con) voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 219 Conservative No votes vs 2 Conservative Aye votes
Vote Tally: Ayes - 298 Noes - 240
Speech in Lords Chamber - Wed 21 Apr 2021
Latin America: Future Foreign Policy

"My Lords, as chairman of the UK branch of Plan International, a charity, for about 20 years, I have regularly visited most of the countries in Latin America. The major problem always was that people obtained all sorts of wonderful things and shelves were stocked but no one knew how …..."
Baroness Gardner of Parkes - View Speech

View all Baroness Gardner of Parkes (Con - Life peer) contributions to the debate on: Latin America: Future Foreign Policy