All 2 Debates between Baroness Garden of Frognal and Lord Smith of Finsbury

Leveson Inquiry

Debate between Baroness Garden of Frognal and Lord Smith of Finsbury
Wednesday 25th April 2012

(12 years, 7 months ago)

Lords Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text Read Debate Ministerial Extracts
Baroness Garden of Frognal Portrait Baroness Garden of Frognal
- Hansard - -

The noble Lord makes a very powerful point. What he said about Ofcom was of course proven to be absolutely valid in the light of the events that unfolded. The sequence of events unfolded fairly rapidly, and the power of the regulator and the respect in which regulators are held have been enhanced by what has happened. We certainly see that Ofcom still has a role to play in matters such as this.

On the matters concerning my honourable friend the Prime Minister, I cannot comment directly.

Lord Smith of Finsbury Portrait Lord Smith of Finsbury
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

My Lords, as a former Secretary of State I re-emphasise the point made by the noble Lord, Lord Fowler. Matters relating to media ownership, public interest and plurality are surely matters to be determined by Ofcom or by the Competition Commission, not by any Secretary of State, however honourable.

Baroness Garden of Frognal Portrait Baroness Garden of Frognal
- Hansard - -

My Lords, we are hearing consensus from all sides of the Chamber on that, and I entirely agree with the noble Lord.

Film Industry: Development and Production

Debate between Baroness Garden of Frognal and Lord Smith of Finsbury
Monday 27th February 2012

(12 years, 9 months ago)

Lords Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text
Baroness Garden of Frognal Portrait Baroness Garden of Frognal
- Hansard - -

I happily join the noble Baroness in congratulating the Oscar winners, and indeed Channel 4 on its recent BAFTA successes and the BBC on its highly acclaimed BAFTA nominations. I entirely agree with her about the important contribution that Channel 4 and the BBC make to British films. However, on her other point, at the moment the Government do not have the levers to require broadcasters to invest in film. As I indicated, we are actively looking at the wide-ranging recommendations put forward by the noble Lord, Lord Smith, in his review, and we will respond to those after due consideration.

Lord Smith of Finsbury Portrait Lord Smith of Finsbury
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

My Lords, in the aftermath of the success of the film “The Artist” at both the BAFTAs and the Oscars, will the Minister recognise that in France the broadcasters are required, in return for their licence, to invest in French film production? This resulted last year in investment of £420 million in French film production. Here in the UK, the BBC currently invests £10 million, Channel 4 invests £15 million, and Sky and ITV invest precisely nothing. Is it not time that all the major broadcasters here in the UK stepped up to the table and played their part in investing in British independent film production?

Baroness Garden of Frognal Portrait Baroness Garden of Frognal
- Hansard - -

I thank the noble Lord for his review, which has some very important recommendations in it. The points that he makes about other countries investing in film are indeed well made and we shall be looking at the patterns that they suggest. However, public funding for film is reasonably substantial. It is estimated to have been £296 million in the financial year 2009-10, which is an increase on the previous year and does not include local authority, research council or higher and further education funding. There is possibly room for more investment from some of the television channels but at the moment British film is not doing too badly from public sector money.