International Development (Official Development Assistance Target) Bill

Debate between Baroness Farrington of Ribbleton and Lord Skelmersdale
Friday 6th February 2015

(9 years, 10 months ago)

Lords Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text Read Debate Ministerial Extracts
Baroness Farrington of Ribbleton Portrait Baroness Farrington of Ribbleton
- Hansard - -

I understood the mover of the amendment to accept that it was not what he intended to achieve. He was corrected by the noble Lord who moved this part of the Bill. It is therefore wrong for people to speak to what they wished the amendment to say rather than what it does say.

Lord Skelmersdale Portrait Lord Skelmersdale (Con)
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

I wonder whether the noble Baroness was listening when the Lord Speaker put the question. She put it very clearly that what we are discussing is the second “the” and not the first.

Parliamentary Voting System and Constituencies Bill

Debate between Baroness Farrington of Ribbleton and Lord Skelmersdale
Monday 14th February 2011

(13 years, 10 months ago)

Lords Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text Read Debate Ministerial Extracts
Baroness Farrington of Ribbleton Portrait Baroness Farrington of Ribbleton
- Hansard - -

My Lords, I thought I heard my noble friend be told by the noble Lord, Lord Tyler, that not voting would count as a no vote in the referendum. This worries me deeply. With my noble friend’s amendment, Parliament will be able to decide, however many people vote for or against AV. That is my understanding. By not voting, people will not contribute to a no vote barring AV being adopted. It is merely a question of whether it becomes automatically binding on Parliament or whether it becomes something that Parliament can judge. I was deeply worried by the description of the noble Lord, Lord Tyler—

Lord Skelmersdale Portrait The Deputy Speaker (Lord Skelmersdale)
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

My Lords, the House should remind itself that we are at Third Reading. The amendment has not yet been moved. There will be an opportunity for any noble Lord to address questions to the noble Lord, Lord Rooker, when he decides what to do with his amendment in due course. May I take it that this amendment has been moved?