Debates between Baroness Evans of Bowes Park and Lord Stunell during the 2015-2017 Parliament

Housing and Planning Bill

Debate between Baroness Evans of Bowes Park and Lord Stunell
Tuesday 22nd March 2016

(8 years, 2 months ago)

Lords Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text
Lord Stunell Portrait Lord Stunell
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

I fully understand that the Minister is going to write to us but if she could give us a hint about whether or not public service buildings, schools and clinics are included in the housing-led concept at this stage, that would be really helpful.

Baroness Evans of Bowes Park Portrait Baroness Evans of Bowes Park
- Hansard - -

Yes, they are included—I hope.

Housing and Planning Bill

Debate between Baroness Evans of Bowes Park and Lord Stunell
Monday 14th March 2016

(8 years, 3 months ago)

Lords Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text
Baroness Evans of Bowes Park Portrait Baroness Evans of Bowes Park
- Hansard - -

I will have to take that away and write to the noble Lord.

Lord Stunell Portrait Lord Stunell
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

I thank the noble Baroness for what she said about taking serious note of the possibility that in some areas there is not a viable level of market rent to support action, and I urge her to take that back to the department and think it through carefully. Clearly quite an important consideration is the calculation of the market rent in a particular area. As I mentioned in my attempted intervention a few minutes ago, at the moment there is a Department for Work and Pensions assessment of market rent for the purposes of the payment of housing benefit, which I believe is something like the lowest quartile of the property available in the local reference area. Certainly, that causes real difficulties in some areas such as my own in Greater Manchester that have higher local market rents. That illustrates a problem I think the department will have in assessing this. If the ceiling were taken at the DWP level it would mean that plenty of areas would not be as viable as they might be if a higher level were taken. Correspondingly, if a higher level is taken you will have the paradox of those on housing benefit being limited to one market value in the area and those who are paying higher rents as a result of this being judged by a different market level in the same area. I just want to alert the Minister to some of the problems that could lie ahead, certainly in my own borough of Stockport and, no doubt, in many other places as well.

Baroness Hollis of Heigham Portrait Baroness Hollis of Heigham
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

I want to follow up my noble friend’s well-spotted point that I had not picked up on. Clause 84(5) says:

“The regulations may provide for assumptions to be made in making a calculation, whether or not those assumptions are, or are likely to be, borne out by events”.

Likely to be borne out by events? Can I just ask the Minister a very simple question which I think might allay our fears? If the Government have got it wrong, do they reimburse local authorities?