Debates between Baroness Evans of Bowes Park and Lord Framlingham during the 2017-2019 Parliament

Business of the House

Debate between Baroness Evans of Bowes Park and Lord Framlingham
Tuesday 26th March 2019

(5 years, 8 months ago)

Lords Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text Read Debate Ministerial Extracts
Baroness Evans of Bowes Park Portrait Baroness Evans of Bowes Park
- Hansard - -

The rationale is that we have two dates agreed with the EU, both now set out in one SI. That means that both situations are covered, which seemed a sensible approach. Again, we will obviously discuss the concerns of the noble Lord, Lord Pannick, and any others that noble Lords wish to raise now that the SI has been tabled, and we look forward to that further discussion tomorrow.

I personally share the frustrations of my noble friends Lord True and Lord Forsyth that we are not leaving the EU on Friday—I know that a number of noble Lords do not—but it is our responsibility to provide legal certainty for the people of this country, and given that the date of our exit from the EU has already been changed I believe it is our duty to take, discuss and, I hope, pass this SI.

Lord Framlingham Portrait Lord Framlingham (Con)
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

What does my noble friend suppose the effect will be on all the businesses that have prepared to leave on 29 March?

Baroness Evans of Bowes Park Portrait Baroness Evans of Bowes Park
- Hansard - -

I think that what businesses and citizens want is certainty. We have now had a decision between the UK Government and the EU that we will extend the date past 29 March. What we owe the country is to ensure that our legal system and statute book reflect that. We will have a further discussion about this tomorrow, but I believe that we as a House should discuss this SI and, I hope, pass it tomorrow to ensure that we have a functioning—