To match an exact phrase, use quotation marks around the search term. eg. "Parliamentary Estate". Use "OR" or "AND" as link words to form more complex queries.


Keep yourself up-to-date with the latest developments by exploring our subscription options to receive notifications direct to your inbox

Division Vote (Lords)
7 Jul 2025 - Renters’ Rights Bill - View Vote Context
Baroness Crawley (Lab) voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 140 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes
Vote Tally: Ayes - 213 Noes - 209
Division Vote (Lords)
2 Jul 2025 - House of Lords (Hereditary Peers) Bill - View Vote Context
Baroness Crawley (Lab) voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 144 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes
Vote Tally: Ayes - 280 Noes - 243
Division Vote (Lords)
2 Jul 2025 - House of Lords (Hereditary Peers) Bill - View Vote Context
Baroness Crawley (Lab) voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 122 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes
Vote Tally: Ayes - 55 Noes - 234
Division Vote (Lords)
2 Jul 2025 - House of Lords (Hereditary Peers) Bill - View Vote Context
Baroness Crawley (Lab) voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 137 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes
Vote Tally: Ayes - 84 Noes - 263
Division Vote (Lords)
30 Jun 2025 - UK-Mauritius Agreement on the Chagos Archipelago - View Vote Context
Baroness Crawley (Lab) voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 140 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes
Vote Tally: Ayes - 185 Noes - 205
Speech in Lords Chamber - Mon 30 Jun 2025
UK-Mauritius Agreement on the Chagos Archipelago

"My Lords, I congratulate the noble and learned Baroness, Lady Prentis of Banbury, on a fine and exhilarating maiden speech. She was my MP until regime change last year, so I personally welcome her to the House. We will certainly miss the noble Lord, Lord Boswell of Aynho. We will …..."
Baroness Crawley - View Speech

View all Baroness Crawley (Lab - Life peer) contributions to the debate on: UK-Mauritius Agreement on the Chagos Archipelago

Division Vote (Lords)
11 Jun 2025 - Armed Forces Commissioner Bill - View Vote Context
Baroness Crawley (Lab) voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 132 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes
Vote Tally: Ayes - 265 Noes - 161
Division Vote (Lords)
2 Jun 2025 - Data (Use and Access) Bill [HL] - View Vote Context
Baroness Crawley (Lab) voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 110 Labour No votes vs 7 Labour Aye votes
Vote Tally: Ayes - 242 Noes - 116
Written Question
Special Operations Executive: Medals
Wednesday 28th May 2025

Asked by: Baroness Crawley (Labour - Life peer)

Question to the Ministry of Defence:

To ask His Majesty's Government what plans they have to retrospectively assess the awards and decorations given to the agents who fought for the UK in the F section of the Special Operations Executive in World War II, in particular (1) the small number of women who received military honours, and (2) the men who were killed but have no British award or decoration.

Answered by Lord Coaker - Minister of State (Ministry of Defence)

There is no doubt that the actions of the agents of F section of the Special Operations Executive were very brave, and the Government remains grateful for their service and sacrifice. Indeed, many were recognised with gallantry awards, such as the awards of the George Cross to Odette Sansom, Noor Khan, Cicely Lefort, Diana Rowden and Lilian Rolfe.

It is the long-standing policy of the UK Government, that military and civilian gallantry awards cannot be awarded retrospectively more than five years after the service or actions in question. This policy has been in place since the end of the Second World War and was approved by King George VI. Successive Governments have seen fit not to change it. It is a long-held belief that people making decisions at the time were better placed to make judgements about an individual’s actions than we can be now at a distance of many years and without information about other people’s contemporary actions for comparison.


Division Vote (Lords)
19 May 2025 - Data (Use and Access) Bill [HL] - View Vote Context
Baroness Crawley (Lab) voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 114 Labour No votes vs 18 Labour Aye votes
Vote Tally: Ayes - 289 Noes - 118