Human Fertilisation and Embryology: Frozen Eggs Storage Debate

Full Debate: Read Full Debate
Department: Department of Health and Social Care

Human Fertilisation and Embryology: Frozen Eggs Storage

Baroness Chisholm of Owlpen Excerpts
Wednesday 20th February 2019

(5 years, 9 months ago)

Lords Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text Read Debate Ministerial Extracts
Baroness Blackwood of North Oxford Portrait Baroness Blackwood of North Oxford
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

The noble Baroness is right: the 2009 regulations were not just concerned with fertility options for people who are already adults. The 55-year limit is intended for those who become infertile through serious illness or side-effects, which can happen in childhood. I understand the concerns about the 10-year limit—there was no consensus during the 2009 review—but it is being continually reviewed and will remain under review by the department.

Baroness Chisholm of Owlpen Portrait Baroness Chisholm of Owlpen (Con)
- Hansard - -

Can my noble friend the Minister say what the Department of Health and Social Care is doing to publicise the fact that it is preferable for women under the age of 35 to harvest their eggs, because after that age the effect is not as good? I realise that some women do not have a choice, but some private firms take a lot of money from women as they get older without telling them of the disappointments they might face.

Baroness Blackwood of North Oxford Portrait Baroness Blackwood of North Oxford
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

My noble friend makes an important point about the success rate of fertility treatment through the freezing of eggs, which is roughly comparable with IVF at 26%. It is important that false hopes are not raised and that women are not exploited in these very sensitive situations.