Equality Act 2010: Supreme Court Judgment Debate

Full Debate: Read Full Debate
Department: Department for Work and Pensions

Equality Act 2010: Supreme Court Judgment

Baroness Burt of Solihull Excerpts
Thursday 27th November 2025

(1 day, 2 hours ago)

Lords Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text Watch Debate Read Debate Ministerial Extracts
Baroness Smith of Malvern Portrait Baroness Smith of Malvern (Lab)
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

Yes, I am very happy to confirm that, as has been the Prime Minister. To be clear, the Supreme Court ruling in relation to the For Women Scotland case is clear; both inside and outside government, we expect it to be followed and, where necessary, people to seek specialist legal advice to enable them to do that.

Baroness Burt of Solihull Portrait Baroness Burt of Solihull (LD)
- View Speech - Hansard - -

My Lords, on costs, what assessment has been made of the potential cost implications for employers and public bodies? How are the Government ensuring that the code does not inadvertently require expensive or disproportionate changes to facilities or service delivery?

Baroness Smith of Malvern Portrait Baroness Smith of Malvern (Lab)
- View Speech - Hansard - - - Excerpts

I do not believe that it will, but understanding costs is of course a routine and regular aspect of decision-making, as I suggested. This is a long and legally complex document that will have an impact on service providers up and down the country. Rightfully, we are carefully considering it and have asked the EHRC not to carry out a full regulatory impact assessment but, rather, to help by providing information on costs to ensure that a full impact assessment is not required, so that Ministers can take a fully informed decision.