Media Oversight: Transfer of Responsibilities

Debate between Baroness Bonham-Carter of Yarnbury and Baroness Garden of Frognal
Thursday 5th July 2012

(11 years, 10 months ago)

Lords Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text
Baroness Garden of Frognal Portrait Baroness Garden of Frognal
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

I would sincerely hope so, my Lords. Social responsibility is written into all government policies across all departments, and DCMS is certainly involved in that.

Baroness Bonham-Carter of Yarnbury Portrait Baroness Bonham-Carter of Yarnbury
- Hansard - -

My Lords, DCMS is a small department that punches way above its weight. Indeed, the creative industries are the fastest growing sector in the economy. Does the Minister agree that, as broadcasting is a key factor in this part of the economy, it and all things pertaining to it should remain within the DCMS?

Media Ownership

Debate between Baroness Bonham-Carter of Yarnbury and Baroness Garden of Frognal
Wednesday 23rd May 2012

(11 years, 11 months ago)

Lords Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text
Baroness Garden of Frognal Portrait Baroness Garden of Frognal
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

The noble Lord makes a very clear distinction between regulation of media in public ownership and media in private ownership which is a valuable one to bear in mind. It is perhaps interesting to cast one’s mind back in history and see if we can think of any particularly philanthropic and beneficial media moguls over the years. It is not a new issue but it is very much an issue of today.

Baroness Bonham-Carter of Yarnbury Portrait Baroness Bonham-Carter of Yarnbury
- Hansard - -

My Lords, does my noble friend agree that tackling the concentration of media ownership is important because greater plurality means greater diversity, and that this can only be good for both our journalism and our politics?

Baroness Garden of Frognal Portrait Baroness Garden of Frognal
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

Yes, indeed—my noble friend makes another important point on this. At the moment the media-plurality public interest test can be triggered only by a merger or takeover; it cannot really take account of organic growth. That is certainly an issue which the current reviews will look at to ensure that owners who take different forms of media into their ownership can also be under scrutiny.

Leveson Inquiry

Debate between Baroness Bonham-Carter of Yarnbury and Baroness Garden of Frognal
Wednesday 25th April 2012

(12 years ago)

Lords Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text Read Debate Ministerial Extracts
Baroness Garden of Frognal Portrait Baroness Garden of Frognal
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

The noble Lord is quite right that Leveson has a very broad remit. However, it is a vehicle for all manner of evidence to be brought into the open and fully discussed. It appears to be doing an extremely thorough job on that basis. The Secretary of State is very well aware that he needs to answer to Parliament, which is one reason why he gave the Statement today followed by a full set of answers to questions. That will continue to be the position. We are not simply pushing these questions to the back of Leveson, but once you have set up an inquiry of this nature, you might also ask—and indeed Lord Justice Leveson has also asked, having set up the inquiry—that it be allowed to proceed.

Baroness Bonham-Carter of Yarnbury Portrait Baroness Bonham-Carter of Yarnbury
- Hansard - -

I thank my noble friend for repeating the Statement. As so often, I find myself echoing my noble friend Lord Fowler. Does the Minister agree that this affair demonstrates that there should be safeguards to ensure that no one organisation should be in a position to own a disproportionate share of the British media—which, by the way, is possible thanks only to the Communications Act 2003 and despite prescient warnings by my noble friend Lord McNally and the noble Lord, Lord Puttnam—and finally, as my noble friend said, that decisions on media mergers should not be taken by politicians but openly and transparently by an appropriate and independent regulatory body?

Baroness Garden of Frognal Portrait Baroness Garden of Frognal
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

I entirely agree with my noble friend. As I mentioned in my reply to my noble friend Lord Fowler, these measures are under way. We are not intending to delay taking this forward. We recognise that in the past the Murdoch empire was an enormously powerful factor for both the Labour Party and the Conservative Party. The coalition Government have now set up a thorough inquiry into those matters, which we hope will come up with some really good answers.

Media: Plurality

Debate between Baroness Bonham-Carter of Yarnbury and Baroness Garden of Frognal
Wednesday 7th March 2012

(12 years, 1 month ago)

Lords Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text
Baroness Garden of Frognal Portrait Baroness Garden of Frognal
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

That might indeed have been the case but we are where we are. The News of the World has closed and of course we now have the new Sun on Sunday, which is a sort of replacement for it. Yes, those actions might have resulted in a different outcome; we cannot know.

Baroness Bonham-Carter of Yarnbury Portrait Baroness Bonham-Carter of Yarnbury
- Hansard - -

Does my noble friend the Minister agree that another important and necessary element of media plurality is the types of journalism practised, and that continued investment in investigative and foreign journalism, as practised by my much mourned friend Marie Colvin, is absolutely essential, and that the BBC, recipient of the licence fee, has a major part to play in this area?

Baroness Garden of Frognal Portrait Baroness Garden of Frognal
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

Yes, indeed, and I join my noble friend in paying tribute to reporters, journalists and photographers who put themselves in dangerous and difficult situations in order to relay important news stories to the outside world. It is always a matter of very deep regret when any of them pays the ultimate price. That is an aspect of the media that deserves our admiration and gratitude, and indeed the role of investigative journalism continues to be of vital importance.

Media: Ownership

Debate between Baroness Bonham-Carter of Yarnbury and Baroness Garden of Frognal
Monday 4th April 2011

(13 years, 1 month ago)

Lords Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text
Baroness Garden of Frognal Portrait Baroness Garden of Frognal
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

My Lords, the independence of the shareholders and the fact that they will not all be members of the Murdoch family are written into the undertakings. The competition aspects were ruled on by the EU Commission, so at the moment issues of plurality rather than competition are to be discussed. However, if the Secretary of State has any misgivings, he can refer the matter to the Competition Commission.

--- Later in debate ---
Baroness Bonham-Carter of Yarnbury Portrait Baroness Bonham-Carter of Yarnbury
- Hansard - -

My Lords, the Secretary of State said last week that the existing check on media plurality,

“may not be as robust as it should be”.

Does the Minister agree that in the upcoming communications Bill rules on media plurality and the merging of media companies should be strengthened?

Baroness Garden of Frognal Portrait Baroness Garden of Frognal
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

My noble friend asks another key question on this. Certainly, the Secretary of State has indicated that there is a potential weakness in media plurality. The forthcoming Bill will indeed provide an occasion to consider this again.