Terrorism Act 2000 (Proscribed Organisations) (Amendment) Order 2025
Debate between Baroness Altmann and Baroness Doocey
Thursday 3rd July 2025
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text Read Debate Ministerial Extracts
(1 week, 4 days ago)
Lords ChamberRead Full debate Read Hansard Text Read Debate Ministerial Extracts
Baroness Altmann (Non-Afl)
Which of the three tests that the noble Lord outlined for something to qualify as an act of terrorism has not been met by this organisation in the example that I gave?
Baroness Doocey (LD)
It is proportionality that I am concerned about. Proscription, as the noble Lord, Lord Anderson, rightly pointed out, would mean that merely expressing approval for Palestine Action, even via an ill-judged retweet, could carry a 14-year prison sentence. I was not particularly convinced by the noble Lord, Lord Carlile, although he is a very long-standing friend, because if the CPS will not prosecute because it is clearly not the right thing to do, why is it there?