Points of Order Debate

Full Debate: Read Full Debate

Baroness Keeley

Main Page: Baroness Keeley (Labour - Life peer)

Points of Order

Baroness Keeley Excerpts
Wednesday 1st December 2021

(3 years ago)

Commons Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text Watch Debate
Baroness Laing of Elderslie Portrait Madam Deputy Speaker
- View Speech - Hansard - - - Excerpts

I thank the hon. Gentleman for his point of order. Once again, it is wrong that questions have been asked and they have not been answered within a reasonable time. Of course, the Chair is not responsible for the content of Ministers’ answers but, again, I suggest two courses of action to him. One is to draw the matter to the attention of the Procedure Committee—I have a bit of a feeling it is going to be busy in this respect because I think this is the sixth point of order of this kind that I have taken in the past few days and I am sure my colleagues have taken more. He also, of course, has the option of consulting the Table Office about ways in which he can bring Ministers to the Chamber to answer the questions. His point is made and I am sure it will have been noted.

Baroness Keeley Portrait Barbara Keeley (Worsley and Eccles South) (Lab)
- View Speech - Hansard - -

On a point of order, Madam Deputy Speaker. I want to correct the record. The Minister for Care and Mental Health, who has now left her place after the statement, persistently said that there was no White Paper from the Labour Government in 2010. That is patently not true. Our March 2010 White Paper “Building the National Care Service” came out just a few months before the general election. We can send her a copy—I will find one—but it is not accurate to say, when we are talking about these important things, that the Labour Government did not have a plan for social care because we did and it was an excellent plan.

Baroness Laing of Elderslie Portrait Madam Deputy Speaker
- View Speech - Hansard - - - Excerpts

I thank the hon. Lady for her point of order, which, as she knows, is a point of debate. She says that the Minister was wrong in her answer and the Minister thinks she was right in the answer. I am so happy to tell the House that it is not for me to decide who was right or who was wrong, although in this case it does seem that the facts speak for themselves.