National Minimum Wage (Workplace Internships) Bill

Debate between Alec Shelbrooke and Lord Mackinlay of Richborough
Friday 4th November 2016

(8 years, 1 month ago)

Commons Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text
Alec Shelbrooke Portrait Alec Shelbrooke
- Hansard - -

I will come to some good examples of businesses that are very successfully making this system work in the way it should. It should be borne in mind that 66% of internships are paid; we are talking about the bottom third, which are very exploitative.

Let me come on to some of the arguments that have been made. Why exclude students? It is simply because they have access to student finance—it is a level playing field. Why exempt people of compulsory school age? I think everybody would agree that work experience makes an important contribution to people at a very early age. Probably—I do not think I am alone in this—a majority of people in this Chamber did at least one week’s work experience during their schooldays. That first step into the world of work is important.

Urban Outfitters is already within the scope of this Bill. It says:

“You must be a student at a UK university undertaking an accredited placement year as part of your sandwich year”.

That shows that the Bill does not reduce opportunity—that someone can work within the exemptions I have put into it, which ultimately bring fairness to it.

Lord Mackinlay of Richborough Portrait Craig Mackinlay (South Thanet) (Con)
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

My hon. Friend is painting a grand picture. We fully understand your concerns, and I agree with them—