Petitions

Thursday 8th January 2026

(3 days, 7 hours ago)

Petitions
Read Hansard Text
Thursday 8 January 2026

Planning applications in Stourport-on-Severn

Thursday 8th January 2026

(3 days, 7 hours ago)

Petitions
Read Hansard Text
The petition of residents of Stourport-on-Severn,
Declares that the community of Stourport-on-Severn has been severely impacted by excessive building applications on agricultural land; and further declares that the first site which crossed district boundaries was refused by both Wyre Forest and Malvern Hills District Councils but was overturned by the Planning Inspectorate, resulting in speculative building applications causing stress to our community and placing severe pressures on our medical, educational and highway resources.
The petitioners therefore request that the House of Commons urge the Government to encourage Malvern Hills District Council to prioritise the protection of agricultural land in its Local Plan, to reject multi-dwelling planning applications within one mile of Areley Kings, Stourport-on-Severn, and to secure a full highway impact assessment for the historic Stourport Bridge crossing for any future developments.
And the petitioners remain, etc.—[Presented by Mark Garnier, Official Report, 11 November 2025; Vol. 775, c. 130.]
[P003122]
Observations from the Minister for Housing and Planning (Matthew Pennycook):
It is a statutory requirement for local planning authorities to prepare a local plan. Local plans are the best way for communities to shape decisions about how to deliver the housing and wider development their areas need. In the absence of an up-to-date plan, there is a high likelihood that development will come forward on a piecemeal and speculative basis, with reduced public engagement and fewer guarantees that it will make the most of an area’s potential. In order to deliver the homes and growth the country needs, we expect all local planning authorities to make every effort to get up-to-date local plans in place as soon as possible.
In preparing a local plan, local planning authorities must consistently apply national policy and guidance, while taking account of local circumstances. As the joint south Worcestershire local plan—covering Worcester city, Malvern Hills district and Wychavon district—is at examination, it is for the relevant independent inspectors to examine the plan publicly and impartially to ensure that it is legally compliant and sound. Local planning authorities can only adopt a plan that is sound.
The national planning policy framework makes it clear that planning policies should recognise the intrinsic character and beauty of the countryside and safeguard the best and most versatile agricultural land, which is the land most valuable for food production. Where significant development of agricultural land is demonstrated to be necessary, areas of poorer-quality land should be preferred to those of a higher quality.
By law, planning applications are determined in accordance with the local development plan, which includes the local plan, unless material considerations indicate otherwise. Each application is judged on its own individual merit and the weight given to these considerations is a matter for the local planning authority as the decision taker in the first instance.
The NPPF also sets out that transport issues should be considered during plan making, using a vision-led approach to identify transport solutions that understand and address the potential impacts of development on transport networks. The NPPF outlines that all developments that will generate significant amounts of movement should be required to provide a travel plan, and that planning applications should be supported by a vision-led transport statement or transport assessment so that the likely impacts of the proposal can be assessed and monitored.
The Government are currently consulting on a new NPPF that includes clearer, rules-based policies for decision making and plan making. The consultation includes policies on agricultural land and promoting sustainable transport. It can be found on gov.uk— https://www.gov.uk/government/consultations/national-planning-policy-framework-proposed-reforms-and-other-changes-to-the-planning-system —and will remain open for responses until 10 March 2026.

Proposed Development and Road Layout Changes in Crawley Down

Thursday 8th January 2026

(3 days, 7 hours ago)

Petitions
Read Hansard Text
The petition of residents of the constituency of East Grinstead and Uckfield,
Declares that the proposal to potentially demolish the existing dwellings in Woodlands Close and to create a significant new access road serving potentially 48 additional homes is inappropriate and would cause significant harm to the wider local community; further declares that the scale of the proposed development is out of keeping with the surrounding area, that residents would be subjected to noise and disruption, that the affordable housing mix of the proposed development is inadequate, that Woodlands Close could not accommodate the volume of traffic that would arise from the development, that the development would risk harming the heritage asset of Grade II listed Burleigh Cottage and the natural environment, and that public consultation regarding this proposal was inadequate and has not taken into account significant flooding risks and topography.
The petitioners therefore request that the House of Commons urge the Government to encourage Mid Sussex District Council to withhold planning permission for this development to protect the wider local community in Crawley Down and in particular any homes impacted by this significant road layout change which will isolate one dwelling in particular.
And the petitioners remain, etc.—[Presented by Mims Davies, Official Report, 19 November 2025; Vol. 775, c. 812.]
[P003136]
Observations from the Minister for Housing and Planning (Matthew Pennycook):
Due to the role of Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government Ministers in the planning system, I am unable to comment on individual cases. By law, planning applications are determined in accordance with the local development plan, unless material considerations indicate otherwise. Each application is judged on its own individual merit and the weight given to these considerations is a matter for the local planning authority as the decision taker in the first instance.

Proposed Solar Development in Wisborough Green

Thursday 8th January 2026

(3 days, 7 hours ago)

Petitions
Read Hansard Text
The petition of residents of Arundel and South Downs,
Declares that the proposed site on land to the south, south-west and north-west of Malham Farm and north-west of Oakwood Farm, Wisborough Green is inappropriate for the construction of a 20MW solar farm by Renewable Connections, due to its scale, location, and associated impacts on the rural setting and residents; further declares that there are no exceptional circumstances that require a solar farm to be built there, and that the local harms far outweigh the merits of this proposal.
The petitioners therefore request that the House of Commons urge the Government to engage with local residents’ groups and to encourage Chichester District Council to refuse planning permission for the proposed 20MW solar farm in Wisborough Green.
And the petitioners remain, etc.—[Presented by Andrew Griffith, Official Report, 2 December 2025; Vol. 776, c. 962.]
[P003140]
Observations from the Minister for Housing and Planning (Matthew Pennycook):
Due to the role of Ministers in the planning system, I am unable to comment on individual cases.
By law, planning applications are determined in accordance with the local development plan, unless material considerations indicate otherwise. Each application is judged on its own individual merit and the weight given to these considerations is a matter for the local planning authority as the decision-taker in the first instance.
Where relevant considerations are raised by local residents within the 21-day statutory publicity period, these must be taken into account by the local authority. However, the weight attached to a particular consideration is a matter of judgment for the local authority as the decision-maker in the first instance.

Regulation of Houses in Multiple Occupation

Thursday 8th January 2026

(3 days, 7 hours ago)

Petitions
Read Hansard Text
The petition of residents of the constituency of South Shields
Declares that the uncontrolled growth of houses in multiple occupation (HMOs) within the constituency is having a detrimental impact on communities, leading to overcrowding, crime, anti-social behaviour, parking pressures, and the erosion of family housing availability; notes that HMOs are subject to different licensing regimes under housing law, including mandatory licensing, additional licensing, and selective licensing; further declares that while these licensing schemes provide oversight of management and safety, the planning system remains the main safeguard against over-concentration; and further declares that without strengthened legislation, HMOs can proliferate unchecked.
The petitioners therefore request that the House of Commons urge the Government to introduce new legislation to regulate and lessen the proliferation of houses in multiple occupation; and to ask that each local authority publishes their strategy and policies on HMOs.
And the petitioners remain, etc.—[Presented by Emma Lewell, Official Report, 03 November 2025; Vol. 774, c. 728.]
[P003124]
Observations from the Minister for Housing and Planning (Matthew Pennycook):
Houses in multiple occupation provide relatively low-cost accommodation for rent and can play an important part in the housing market.
National permitted development rights are a grant of planning permission for certain types of development set out in legislation. Under the planning system, a permitted development right allows a house (the C3 dwellinghouse use class) to change use to a small HMO (the C4 use class) for up to six people sharing facilities without the need for a planning application. Larger HMOs require an application for planning permission.
Local authorities already have planning powers to limit the proliferation of small HMOs within their locality. Where there is sufficient evidence of the need to do so, a local planning authority may withdraw a permitted development right in a specific area using an article 4 direction, after consultation with the local community.
This would mean any change of use to both large and small HMOs would require an application for planning permission, which is determined in accordance with the development plan for the area and provides an opportunity for local people to comment. It is important that local areas have relevant, up-to-date policies in place against which any planning applications or appeals will be determined.
The national planning policy framework requires local authorities to plan to meet housing needs. The size, type and tenure of housing needed for different groups in the community should be assessed and reflected in the development plan and other planning policies which are publicly available.
In relation to HMO licensing, under the Housing Act 2004 local authorities have powers to license HMOs to ensure they are safe, well-maintained and properly managed. Local authorities must license HMOs where five or more people from two or more separate households share facilities (“mandatory licensing”). Following consultation, local authorities can also choose to licence smaller HMOs where three or four people from two or more separate households share facilities (“additional licensing”).
A licensed HMO property must meet mandatory conditions around fire safety, minimum room size and provision of amenities. The licence holder—and manager, where relevant—must undergo a fit-and-proper-person test. Local authorities can also add bespoke licence conditions, for example to improve facilities, and have the power to inspect licensed HMOs without notice where they believe an offence is being committed under HMO legislation.
All HMOs, regardless of whether they require a licence, must also comply with the HMO management regulations. These impose duties on the manager of an HMO, typically the landlord, including providing adequate bins and waste collection.
Where a landlord fails to licence an HMO, or does not comply with HMO licence conditions or the HMO management regulations, local authorities can prosecute them, impose civil penalties of up to £30,000 as an alternative to prosecution, or seek a banning order. A landlord who commits a serious offence, such as failing to obtain a mandatory licence could also be subject to a rent repayment order, where they can be ordered to repay up to 12 months of rent to a tenant or local authority.
The Government keep the powers to regulate HMOs under review.