Petitions

Monday 13th October 2025

(1 day, 23 hours ago)

Petitions
Read Hansard Text
Monday 13 October 2025

Sherston Surgery

Monday 13th October 2025

(1 day, 23 hours ago)

Petitions
Read Hansard Text
The petition of residents of Sherston and the surrounding villages,
Declares that the future of Sherston surgery remains uncertain; that the existing Tolsey surgery in Sherston is no longer fit for purpose; a new purpose-built surgery has been offered by a developer; the integrated care board has to date refused to commit to operating NHS services from the proposed new premises; further declares that, without such a commitment, many residents in Sherston and neighbouring villages are in danger of being left without reasonable access to essential NHS primary care services
The petitioners therefore request that the House of Commons urges the Government to take immediate action to support the establishment and ongoing operation of a new healthcare facility in Sherston to ensure continued access to NHS services for the local community.
And the petitioners remain, etc.—[Presented by Dr Roz Savage, Official Report, 16 July 2025; Vol. 771, c. 390.]
[P003094]
Observations from the Minister for Care (Stephen Kinnock):
Bath and North East Somerset, Swindon and Wiltshire integrated care board has confirmed that it has regular dialogue with the surgery team at Tolsey, and is committed to supporting the practice with the day-to-day running of its services as well as larger, longer-term projects.
The ICB is responsible for planning and commissioning services to meet the reasonable needs of people in the locality, and managing costs within its allocated budget. In line with the primary care network service and estates planning toolkit, the ICB needs to evidence a robust primary care investment plan, with clear priorities aligned to its wider strategies, in order to prioritise local primary care investment requirements over other system demands for capital funding.
Investment in general practice premises usually requires additional revenue funding, when the capital investment will increase the value of the premises. This represents a potential ongoing cost to the ICB because GP contractors are entitled to request reimbursements of their premises costs, including rent.
Such decisions are kept under constant review, and the ICB continues to listen and engage with the practice and its staff, and with interested parties from across the community in Sherston, around all aspects of local health provision.
As set out in the 10-year plan, to support ICBs with longer-term planning, the Government will introduce multi-year capital budgets, set on a rolling five-year basis, in line with wider Government capital allocations. Further detail will be set out in due course.

Paignton Post Office

Monday 13th October 2025

(1 day, 23 hours ago)

Petitions
Read Hansard Text
The petition of residents of the constituency of Torbay,
Declares that Paignton post office has been threatened with closure, and further declares that post offices, and the services they provide, are vital parts of our community.
The petitioners therefore request that the House of Commons urge the Government and the post office to reverse their decision to put Paignton post office at risk of closure.
And the petitioners remain, etc.—[Presented by Steve Darling, Official Report, 02 April 2025; Vol. 765, c. 390.]
[P003062]
Observations from the Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State for Business and Trade (Blair McDougall):
Thank you to the petitioners for raising concerns regarding the potential closure of Paignton post office.
As announced on 8 April, Post Office is moving to a fully franchised network as part of its commitment to deliver a new deal for postmasters. This means all 108 current directly managed branches (DMBs)—also known as Crown branches—are in scope of these changes, including Paignton post office.
Despite accounting for less than 1% of the total network, DMBs generate significant losses for Post Office. To address the losses these branches incur, and having reviewed alternative options, Post Office has concluded that moving to a fully franchised network is the only solution that protects post office services in communities. Transitioning to a franchise model is expected to result in over £100 million of savings for the company over the next five years.
While the potential location of a post office outlet remains an operational matter for Post Office, it may alleviate your concerns to learn that Post Office intends to replace DMBs with mains branches where possible (mains branches offer similar services to DMBs). Where this is not possible, Post Office has committed to ensure that all communities currently served by a DMB will have at least one mains branch within a one-mile radius of the existing branch, meaning customers continue to have access to a full suite of products and services, including cash deposits and withdrawals and key Government services, such as passport applications and DVLA services.
Post Office is currently working with prospective franchise partners to find the best outcome for each DMB location. In terms of what this means at a local level for each DMB, Post Office will keep staff and customers informed about changes to individual branches as plans progress.

Redundancies at Lancaster University

Monday 13th October 2025

(1 day, 23 hours ago)

Petitions
Read Hansard Text
The petition of residents of the constituency of Lancaster and Wyre,
Declares that Lancaster University is currently considering a series of staff redundancies, initially voluntary, which could see the University lose around 450 jobs, with compulsory redundancies not ruled out. Staff trade unions, UCU, Unite and Unison, are consulting with their members and are concerned about the job losses as well as the impact on the wider area with the Lancaster District benefiting from having a successful university in its footprint.
The petitioners therefore request that the House of Commons urge the Government to take immediate action to ensure universities are supported to ensure security of employment for staff and a high-quality learning experience for students.
And the petitioners remain, etc—[Presented by Cat Smith, Official Report, 21 July 2025; Vol. 771, c. 663.]
[P003100]
Observations from the Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State for Education (Josh MacAlister):
The Government note the concerns raised in the petition regarding employment security and the quality of the student learning experience at Lancaster University.
Given that universities are independent, they are responsible for the pay and provision of staff. Government does not have a role in intervening with specific providers in pay and staffing matters or in resolving disputes between providers and their staff.
However, we expect providers to work with staff, using their knowledge and experience to help identify how best to operate efficiently. All efficiency measures taken by the sector should provide a better long-term future for staff, students and the country.
Though universities are autonomous, this Government are committed to supporting the sector in moving towards a more stable financial footing. That is why we have made the difficult decision to increase tuition fee limits in the 2025-26 academic year by 3.1%, in line with inflation.
While the Office for Students has statutory duties in relation to the financial sustainability of the higher education sector, the Government have a clear interest in understanding the sector’s level of risk. As such, the Department for Education continues to work closely with the OfS in order to better understand the sector’s changing financial landscape.
We have also appointed Professor Edward Peck as OfS chair, where he will play a key role in strengthening its commitment to financial sustainability while also expanding opportunities in higher education.
Moreover, the Government provide funding through the strategic priorities grant on an annual basis to support teaching and students in higher education. This includes funding to support teaching of expensive-to-deliver subjects such as science and engineering, access and participation of students from under-represented groups, and world-leading specialist providers. The total SPG for the 2025-26 financial year will be £1,348 million in recurrent (programme) grant and £84 million for capital to support teaching and learning.
Ministers and officials continue to engage regularly with the sector, the unions and the employer body to better understand the issues affecting HE providers and the workforce.
The DfE aim to publish its plans for HE reform soon as part of the post-16 skills White Paper, and work with the sector and the OfS to deliver the change that the country needs.

Disabled bus passes during peak hours

Monday 13th October 2025

(1 day, 23 hours ago)

Petitions
Read Hansard Text
The Petition of residents of North Yorkshire,
Declares that restricting the use of disabled persons’ bus passes during peak hours is unfair and places additional barriers on disabled people, who already face significant structural and societal inequalities, including higher living costs and limited transport options.
The petitioners therefore request that the House of Commons urges the Government to allow disabled people to use their bus passes at all times of day, including during peak hours, to promote fairness, independence, and equal access to public transport.
And the petitioners remain, etc.—[Presented by Tom Gordon, Official Report, 08 September 2025; Vol. 772, c. 689.]
[P003099]
Observation from the Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State for Transport (Simon Lightwood):
The Government want everyone to have access to public transport and are committed to improving bus services. We also recognise the importance of the English national concessionary travel scheme (ENCTS) in supporting local bus travel, assisting with access to essential local services and helping those who use the scheme to stay active and avoid isolation.
The ENCTS provides free off-peak bus travel to those with eligible disabilities and those of state pension age between 9.30 am and 11.00 pm on weekdays and all day at weekends and on bank holidays. The duration of the concessionary period was set out in the Transport Act 2000. The ENCTS costs around £700 million annually and any changes to the statutory obligations, including extending the hours of use, would therefore need to be carefully considered for its impact on the scheme’s financial sustainability. Therefore, the Government do not have any current plans to remove the time restriction.
Local authorities in England do have the power to offer concessions in addition to their statutory obligations, for example, by allowing the ENCTS pass to be used outside of the statutory hours. These are additional local concessions provided and funded by local authorities from local resources, depending on the needs and priorities of each area.
According to concessionary travel statistics for the year ending March 2025, approximately 78% of local authorities extended the beginning of the statutory time period (9.30 am) during weekdays, including, for example, Cambridgeshire and Peterborough combined authority area, where concessionary passholders can travel for free on local bus services at all hours. In addition, during August, Greater Manchester combined authority ran a trial allowing ENCTS pass holders to travel on buses before 9.30 am. They are planning another trial in November where ENCTS passes will be valid at all times of day. Various similar schemes also exist in other parts of the country.
At the autumn 2024 Budget, the Government confirmed a £1 billion boost for buses, of which £712 million has been allocated to local authorities to support and improve bus services. York and North Yorkshire combined authority has been allocated £12.7 million of this funding. Funding allocated to local authorities to improve services for passengers can be used in whichever way they wish, including extending the hours of use for concessionary bus passes locally.
The Government reaffirmed its commitment to investing in bus services long-term in this spending review. On 11 June, the Government confirmed additional funding per year from 26/27 to maintain and improve bus services, including taking forward franchising pilots and extending the £3 bus fare cap until March 2027.

Parking Enforcement: Hurstcroft Road and Eddish Road

Monday 13th October 2025

(1 day, 23 hours ago)

Petitions
Read Hansard Text
The petition of residents on Hurstcroft Road and Eddish Road, B33
Declares that West Midlands Police, in collaboration with Birmingham city council, must seek to address the persistent parking offences around Lea Forest academy school, between the hours of 8AM-9AM, and 2:30PM and 3:30PM, to help improve the wellbeing and lives of local residents.
The petitioners therefore request that the House of Commons urge the Government to work with both West Midlands police, and Birmingham city council, to set out greater enforcement for parking violations around Lea Forest academy, on Hurstcroft Road, and Eddish Road.
And the petitioners remain, etc. —[Presented by Liam Byrne, Official Report, 2 June 2025; Vol. 768, c. 133.]
[P003076]
Observations from the Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State for Transport (Lilian Greenwood):
Responsibility for traffic management on local roads rests with the relevant local authority, as it is best placed to consider how local needs can most effectively be met. It is therefore a matter for individual authorities to decide on the nature and scope of parking policies and to balance the needs of residents, emergency services, local businesses and those who work in and visit the areas.
Under section 122 of the Road Traffic Regulation Act 1984, local authorities have a statutory responsibility to provide appropriate traffic management schemes for the roads they manage. They are free to make their own decisions about the streets under their care, provided they take account of the relevant legislation.
Local authorities can put in place school “keep clear” markings, which are legally enforceable when used in conjunction with an upright road sign—as prescribed in the Traffic Signs Regulations and General Directions 2016, as amended.
Current legislation permits the police, or local authorities with civil enforcement powers, to carry out enforcement via issue of a penalty charge notice. There are two levels of penalty charges with the higher level applying to the more serious contraventions, which includes parking on zig-zag markings. It is for each authority to decide how they will carry out their enforcement duties.
Under Part 6 of the Traffic Management Act 2004, local authorities with existing civil parking enforcement powers can issue penalty charge notices for contraventions of moving traffic restrictions. Examples of such restrictions include ignoring no entry signs, performing banned turns, access restrictions for certain vehicle classes and unlawful entry into box junctions. The police retain powers to enforce such restrictions and any police action would take precedence.
Local authorities wanting to undertake civil enforcement of moving traffic contraventions must apply to the Secretary of State for an order to be made designating the council as the enforcement authority in their area. Only then can enforcement begin in practice. Birmingham city council was granted moving traffic enforcement powers in July 2023. Once local authorities have been granted a designation order for moving traffic enforcement, they can begin enforcing school street restrictions.
School streets are signed using existing “no motor vehicle” or “pedestrian and cycle zone” signs. These are already available to local authorities and clearly indicate that during the times of operation, the road is closed to motor vehicles. They allow for a range of exceptions to be provided, for example for blue badge holders, or resident permit holders. The Department’s view is that existing signs work well and there are therefore no plans to introduce alternatives. When a scheme is introduced, local authorities should work with schools and residents to make sure it is publicised in advance and drivers are fully aware of the changes and can adjust their journeys accordingly.
In November 2024 the Department published guidance for local authorities on implementing school streets, which includes advice on signing the restrictions https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/school-streets-how-to-set-up-and-manage-a-scheme/school-streets-how-to-set-up-and-manage-a-scheme

Road safety near primary schools in Suffolk Coastal

Monday 13th October 2025

(1 day, 23 hours ago)

Petitions
Read Hansard Text
The petition of residents of the Suffolk Coastal constituency,
Declares that there is growing concern about the prevalence of speeding and dangerous driving near primary schools across the constituency, which puts the safety of children, parents, and school staff at serious risk. This petition further declares that many schools lack adequate road safety measures such as 20mph zones, pedestrian crossings, speed enforcement, and safe walking routes.
The petitioners therefore request that the House of Commons urge the Government to ensure Suffolk County Council prioritises the safety of children by developing and publishing a tailored road safety action plan for every primary school in the Suffolk Coastal constituency.
And the petitioners remain, etc.—[Presented by Jenny Riddell-Carpenter, Official Report, 16 September 2025; Vol. 772, c. 1465.]
[P003114]
Observations from the Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State for Transport (Lilian Greenwood):
Local traffic authorities have the power to set 20 mph speed limits where people and traffic mix, for example outside schools. They can also set enforceable 20 mph limits that apply only at certain times of day, such as at school drop-off and pick-up times.
They are asked to have regard to the Department’s guidance on setting local speed limits at www.gov.uk/government/publications/setting-local-speed-limits which is designed to make sure that speed limits are appropriately and consistently set while allowing for flexibility to deal with local circumstances, but the final decision is for the traffic authority, working with the police who would carry out any enforcement.
Local authorities are also free to make their own decisions about the design of the streets under their care, provided they take account of the relevant legislation. A range of traffic management tools are available to them to improve safety near schools, including traffic calming, pedestrian crossings and school streets. The Government expect local authorities like Suffolk county council to work with the local parents and children in Suffolk Coastal to address their concerns about road safety in their local area.
The Department for Transport has published guidance on the design of pedestrian crossings in chapter 6 of the traffic signs manual. This is available at: www.gov.uk/government/publications/traffic-signs-manual
Guidance on traffic calming measures is published in local transport note 1/07 “Traffic Calming” which is available at www.gov.uk/government/publications/local-transport-notes
In November last year, Active Travel England and the Department for Transport published guidance for local authorities on implementing school streets. This is available at www.gov.uk/government/publications/school-streets-how-to-set-up-and-manage-a-scheme
The Government believe the legislation and guidance already in place is appropriate to allow local authorities to implement suitable traffic calming measures based on local needs and priorities.