Petitions

Friday 24th May 2024

(1 month ago)

Petitions
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text
Friday 24 May 2024

Observations

Friday 24th May 2024

(1 month ago)

Petitions
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text

Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office

Friday 24th May 2024

(1 month ago)

Petitions
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text

Popular uprising in Iran

Friday 24th May 2024

(1 month ago)

Petitions
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text
The petition of residents of the United Kingdom,
Declares that in response to protests and anti-regime uprisings led by women and youth throughout Iran, Iranian repressive forces have opened fire on protestors; notes that more than 750 protestors have been killed including 83 women and 75 children, as well as more than 30,000 protestors arrested; further notes that Amnesty International has reported that child detainees have been subjected to horrific torture, including beatings, flogging, electric shocks, rape and other sexual violence; further declares that the regime’s deliberate poisoning of schoolgirls across Iran is to take revenge on young girls for participating in demonstrations, with the number of executions increased to over 400 this year; further notes that the UN Special Rapporteur on Iran has categorised the atrocities during the uprising as Crimes Against Humanity; and further declares opposition to the killings and arrests of protestors, and support for the Iranian people’s uprising to achieve democracy and freedom.
The petitioners therefore request that the House of Commons urge the Government to condemn the Iranian Government’s violent crackdown on protests led by women and youth, support democratic movements in Iran and put pressure on the Iranian regime to stop the repression.
And the petitioners remain, etc.—[Presented by Caroline Nokes, Official Report, Tuesday 30 April 2024; Vol. 749, c. 230.]
[P002969]
Observations from the Minister for the Middle East, North Africa, South Asia, United Nations and the Commonwealth (Lord Ahmad): We condemn the Iranian regime for its violent crackdown on protests led by women and youth. We continue to utilise targeted sanctions, and work alongside partners, to hold Iran to account.
Substantive response:
The UK Government condemn the Iranian regime for its continued repression of fundamental freedoms, including against women and girls, and human rights defenders. We have been clear that the “Woman Life Freedom” movement was an authentic, grassroots call for change.
Furthermore, the UK Government responded decisively to the Iranian authorities’ crackdown on protesters. In October 2022, one month after the death of Mahsa Amini, we sanctioned leading political and security officials responsible for serious human rights violations.
In November 2022, we worked alongside partners to establish a fact-finding mission at the UN Human Rights Council, to thoroughly and independently investigate the regime’s treatment of protesters.
In December 2022, we were instrumental in revoking Iran’s membership of the UN Commission on the Status of Women. The UK’s permanent representative to the UN, Barabara Woodward, delivered a statement to the UN Economic and Social Council, imploring members to remove Iran from CSW and expressing solidarity with Iranian women and girls.
After the protests were muted due to the authorities’ violent crackdown, we sought to maintain pressure on Iran in the international sphere. In November 2023, we co-sponsored an Iran human rights resolution at the UN Third Committee. The resolution condemned the measures used by authorities to respond to the protests, such as arbitrary detention, the disproportionate use of force, and the use of force resulting in the death of peaceful protesters.
The resolution also underscored the UK’s and partners’ serious concerns at reports of ill-treatment during arrest, physical and psychological abuse, and physical violence in detention, including sexual and gender-based violence.
In July 2023, the Minister of State for the Middle East, Lord Ahmad, condemned Iran for its brutal use of executions as a means of stifling dissent. Lord Ahmad called on Iran to issue a moratorium on the death penalty as a first step in changing course and listening to the concerns of the Iranian people.
We will continue to hold Iran to account for its human rights violations. Since Mahsa Amini’s death, we have sanctioned 94 individuals or entities responsible for human rights violations. The fact-finding mission has the UK’s full support until the completion of its mandate next year, and we welcome the findings of its first report, published on 8 March.
It is clear that human rights defenders in Iran continue to be targeted by the regime, with nine protesters being executed in association with the protests. We call on Iran to immediately release all those unjustly detained.
We stand with the Iranian people in their struggle for fundamental freedoms.

Education

Friday 24th May 2024

(1 month ago)

Petitions
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text

St. Leonard's Catholic School

Friday 24th May 2024

(1 month ago)

Petitions
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text
The petition of residents of the United Kingdom,
Declares that the Department for Education is not doing enough to mitigate the anxieties and stress of the parents, pupils and teachers at St. Leonard’s Catholic School in City of Durham following on from the disruption caused by RAAC; further declares that pupils at St. Leonard’s Catholic School have not been offered mitigating circumstances for the disruption to their education caused by RAAC.
The petitioners therefore request that the House of Commons urges the Government to bring forward legislation to ensure that the Secretary of State for Education can provide the pupils at St. Leonard’s Catholic School mitigating circumstances for their exams this year, and all those who suffer similar circumstances.
And the petitioners remain, etc.—[Presented by Mary Kelly Foy, Official Report, 23 April 2024; Vol. 748, c. 907.]
[P002959]
Observations from the Minister for Schools (Damian Hinds): The safety of staff and pupils is paramount, and the Department for Education is working closely with schools and colleges to provide the support and resources to mitigate the presence of reinforced autoclaved aerated concrete. There are over 22,000 schools and colleges in England and the vast majority are unaffected by RAAC—around 1% have confirmed RAAC in some areas of their buildings. The Department’s RAAC identification programme is complete. Any school or college that advised us that they suspect they might have RAAC has had a survey to confirm if RAAC is present. We have confirmed to all schools and colleges how they will be funded to remove RAAC permanently, either through grants or through the school rebuilding programme.
We are supporting schools and colleges to keep any disruption to education to an absolute minimum and put in place bespoke plans based on their individual circumstances. All schools and colleges with confirmed RAAC are providing full-time face-to-face education. Every case is unique and the impact on schools is highly varied. In some cases there is no impact on teaching space, or it is limited to small areas; for example, RAAC may be limited to a single classroom. We are taking every step possible to remove any obstacles to learning. For some schools, this may include funding to provide additional education support for their pupils, such as online tutoring or extra lessons.
We have worked particularly closely with St Leonard’s Catholic School and Bishop Wilkinson Catholic Education Trust, and have provided extensive practical and financial assistance. This includes alternative spaces for learning and funding to put extra education provision in place. All pupils at St Leonard’s have been in full-time face-to-face education since October, and additional education support is available to pupils, including those due to sit exams this year. Additional specialist facilities had initially been sourced at other providers in the local area, including science laboratories at Durham University and at another local school within the trust, St Bede’s Catholic School and Sixth Form College, Lanchester—with transport provided for pupils. The school now has access to its own specialist facilities.
The trust has also received significant funding for RAAC-related costs. This includes funding for curriculum support, staffing costs and software packages to provide additional education support for pupils. The school and trust continue to receive support from a dedicated team of officials, all of whom are fully committed to supporting the trust and the school to address the impact of RAAC on pupils and staff. They meet regularly with BWCET representatives and the school to develop and deliver solutions to address the impact of RAAC.
The Department has worked closely with Ofqual and awarding organisations to understand what mitigations can be made for students at RAAC-affected schools sitting exams this year within the current regulatory system.
We have also worked with Ofqual and awarding organisations to facilitate discussions with St Leonard’s School. We have asked awarding organisations to, where possible, agree extensions to deadlines for the submission of coursework and non-exam assessments so that pupils have as much time as possible to complete these tasks. We have asked awarding organisations to offer as much flexibility as possible when granting these extensions and this has been a key area of support offered to RAAC-affected pupils within the existing qualifications framework.
In cases where pupils who have covered the full content of a course are impeded from demonstrating their regular level of attainment at the time of their assessment (for example, if there was ongoing noise during an examination), special consideration can be used as a mechanism to provide minor adjustments to pupils’ marks. JCQ member awarding organisations, including those which offer GCSEs and A-levels, have published guidance which sets out when it may be applied and in what possible circumstances. JCQ has also published specific guidance on how existing special consideration arrangements may apply to centres affected by RAAC or other building issues, particularly in the context of non-exam assessment— https://www.jcq. org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2020/03/High-Lev1 RAAC mitigations FINAL.pdf. Special consideration arrangements may apply in a number of different situations.
Special consideration only applies to incidents that occur at the time of an assessment. It is not possible to make adjustments to grading to reflect variabilities in teaching or provision that students may have experienced, or any other issues individual pupils may face over the course of their study that may affect their learning. This is because exams and other formal assessments are designed to be an impartial measure of a pupil’s performance at a particular point in time, and our qualifications system has always reflected the variability in pupils’ experiences in schools and colleges in their results.
Ofqual, as the exams regulator for England, is responsible for maintaining qualification standards and promoting public confidence in regulated qualifications and national assessments. Ofqual’s statutory objectives, as set out in the Apprenticeships, Skills, Children and Learning Act 2009, require it to regulate awarding organisations to ensure that qualifications give a reliable and consistent indication of pupils’ knowledge, skills and understanding. This means that regulated qualifications, such as GCSEs and A-levels, must represent what pupils know, understand and can do at the point of assessment, rather than what they might have known and been able to do if they had been taught differently, or under different circumstances. This is important as it ensures that the evidence used to grade and award qualifications is consistent and can be trusted, and that both holders of qualifications and those using them to make decisions (such as employers or higher education institutions) can be confident in the information they convey about students’ achievements.
A reliable indication of the knowledge, skills and understanding of those taking qualifications and assessments is achieved by ensuring pupils taking a given qualification are assessed and graded to the same standard. It is therefore not possible to bring forward legislation to allow qualification grading to be amended to reflect any disruption to learning that pupils at RAAC-affected schools, such as St Leonard’s, might have experienced without undermining the role of qualifications to fairly represent the actual attainment of pupils. Introducing such legislation would create a system where different standards were to be applied for different groups of students, and result in qualifications that would not provide a reliable indication of knowledge, skills and understanding.
It is important that schools and colleges with concerns about exams and questions about whether their students will be eligible for special consideration contact the relevant awarding organisation as soon as possible to discuss their specific circumstances. Decisions on special consideration, when it is or is not appropriate, are for each awarding organisation to make on a case-by- case basis.
The Department is committed to supporting BWCET and St Leonard’s and is continuing to work with them in the interests of pupils. We have also confirmed that St Leonard’s will be rebuilt as part of our school rebuilding programme, which is transforming over 500 schools across England.

Environment, Food and Rural Affairs

Friday 24th May 2024

(1 month ago)

Petitions
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text

Protection of the Amazon rainforest

Friday 24th May 2024

(1 month ago)

Petitions
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text
The petition of the residents of the United Kingdom,
Declares that the Amazon is the world’s largest rainforest and makes up half of the planet’s remaining tropical forests, home to about three million species of plants and animals and 1.6 million indigenous people; further notes that the forest is the world’s largest natural carbon sinks, absorbing and storing an amount of carbon equivalent to 15 to 20 years of global CO2 emissions from the atmosphere; and further declares continued deforestation of the Amazon is contributing to the forest’s inability to recover from droughts, fires and landslides.
The petitioners therefore request that the House of Commons urges the Government to encourage the Brazilian Government to protect forest land and end large-scale deforestation, to prevent nearly half of the Amazon rainforest from collapsing and that these irreversible consequences for the Amazon and the planet are avoided.
And the petitioners remain, etc.—[Presented by Martyn Day, Official Report, 30 April 2024; Vol. 749, c. 229 .]
[P002964]
Observations from the Under-Secretary of State for Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Affairs, the hon. Member for Macclesfield (David Rutley):
The UK is committed to working with Brazil to address deforestation of the Amazon and its detrimental impact on global climate, environmental conservation and the communities who reside there.
Following his election in October 2022, the UK welcomed President Lula’s vocal commitment to Brazil’s domestic action on climate change, including net reduction in deforestation by 2030. We commend Brazil for delivering impressive results already, notably a 51% reduction of deforestation levels in 2023.
Climate and nature have long been central to the UK’s relationship with Brazil, and we are proud to be the third biggest contributor of climate finance to Brazil, with more than £511 million committed.
The Prime Minister met President Lula in May last year, when he announced a UK contribution of £80 million to Brazil’s Amazon fund. An additional £35 million was announced at COP28, making the UK the fund’s second largest donor.
This funding supports initiatives under the green and inclusive growth (GIG) partnership, announced by former Foreign Secretary James Cleverly during his visit to Brazil last May, for which an implementation plan was launched at COP28 in December.
The GIG partnership is driving strengthened co-operation and dialogue to support Brazil’s economic transition to net zero, turn the tide on deforestation, and develop a bioeconomy to generate new commercial opportunities for Brazil and the UK.
Taking care of forests and their peoples is a key pillar. Our aim is to combat deforestation and promote a socio-bioeconomy involving non-timber products, in addition to fostering biodiversity goals more broadly and tackling illegal gold supply chains.
Promoting the rights and engagement of indigenous peoples and local communities who reside in the Amazon is also a priority. This year, our partnerships for forests (P4F) programme came to an end, with a total of £24 million invested in Brazilian bioeconomy businesses. In the state of Para alone, which is set to host COP30 next year, P4F reached more than 3,500 people and secured more than 16,000 hectares under improved management of sustainable land use.
This year, with Brazil holding the G20 presidency, the UK continues to engage closely to support concrete outcomes on climate, nature and energy.
The second permanent under-secretary of the Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office, Nick Dyer, visited Brazil in March. He visited a UK PACT project on sustainable supply chains in Para and met with civil society representatives to discuss the threat posed by deforestation to indigenous communities and the alternative bioeconomies that could enable sustainable livelihoods.
My visit to Brazil in May, shortly after the devastating extreme weather and flooding in Rio Grande do Sul, highlighted the importance of working together with Brazil and other international partners to mitigate and adapt to the climate crisis to lessen the impact of similar incidents in future.
Looking ahead to 2025 and Brazil’s hosting of COP30, at a pivotal moment 10 years on from the Paris agreement, we are exploring how to support Brazil’s vision and have already started a series of COP26-to-COP30 dialogues to share expertise from the preparation and delivery of COP26. This includes engaging with Brazil on its proposal to develop a tropical forests forever fund by COP30.
We will continue to work with Brazil through to COP30 and beyond to protect forests, address the global climate and nature crisis and build a more sustainable, just and inclusive future together.